Sybren Stuvel wrote:
> Donn Cave enlightened us with:
>> Oh, excellent - the string module is dead, long live the string
>> module! I can replace string.join with str.join, and never have to
>> defile my code with that ' '.join(x) abomination.
>
> It's not an abomination. It's a very clear way o
Donn Cave wrote:
[...]
>
> Oh, excellent - the string module is dead, long live
> the string module! I can replace string.join with
> str.join, and never have to defile my code with that
> ' '.join(x) abomination.
>
>>> lst = ['Steve', 'Holden']
>>> str.join(' ', lst)
'Steve Holden'
>>>
J
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anoop wrote:
> > Thanks Stefen
> >
> > let me be more specific how would i have to write the following
> > function in the deprecated format
> >
> > map(string.lower,list)
> >
> To avoid the deprecated usage you would us
Steve Holden ha scritto:
> Anoop wrote:
> > Thanks Stefen
> >
> > let me be more specific how would i have to write the following
> > function in the deprecated format
> >
> > map(string.lower,list)
> >
> To avoid the deprecated usage you would use the unbound method of the
> str type (that's the
Anoop wrote:
> let me be more specific how would i have to write the following
> function in the deprecated format
>
> map(string.lower,list)
What you just wrote is the deprecated format.
There are plenty of ways to write it in an undeprecated format. The
simplest is probably:
[ s.lower()
Anoop wrote:
> Thanks Stefen
>
> let me be more specific how would i have to write the following
> function in the deprecated format
>
> map(string.lower,list)
>
> Thanks Anoop
Ah. This is easy enough:
lower_list = [s.lower() for s in str_list]
Or, if you really like map() (or really don't like
Anoop wrote:
> Thanks Stefen
>
> let me be more specific how would i have to write the following
> function in the deprecated format
>
> map(string.lower,list)
>
To avoid the deprecated usage you would use the unbound method of the
str type (that's the type of all strings):
>>> lst = ['Steve
Thanks Stefen
let me be more specific how would i have to write the following
function in the deprecated format
map(string.lower,list)
Thanks Anoop
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Anoop wrote:
> > Can any one help me out with the various depricated string functions
> > that is followed in Python.
> >
>
John Machin wrote:
> On 20/07/2006 5:18 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
>
>>Anoop wrote:
>>
>>>Hi All
>>>
>>>Can any one help me out with the various depricated string functions
>>>that is followed in Python.
>>>
>>>For example how will be string.lower depricated.
>>>
>>>As far as string.lower('PYTHON') i
On 20/07/2006 5:18 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> Anoop wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> Can any one help me out with the various depricated string functions
>> that is followed in Python.
>>
>> For example how will be string.lower depricated.
>>
>> As far as string.lower('PYTHON') is concerned it is depricated a
Anoop wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Can any one help me out with the various depricated string functions
> that is followed in Python.
>
> For example how will be string.lower depricated.
>
> As far as string.lower('PYTHON') is concerned it is depricated as
> 'PYTHON'.lower(). Both of them would return an
Anoop wrote:
> Can any one help me out with the various depricated string functions
> that is followed in Python.
>
> For example how will be string.lower depricated.
>
> As far as string.lower('PYTHON') is concerned it is depricated as
> 'PYTHON'.lower(). Both of them would return an output : >>
Hi All
Can any one help me out with the various depricated string functions
that is followed in Python.
For example how will be string.lower depricated.
As far as string.lower('PYTHON') is concerned it is depricated as
'PYTHON'.lower(). Both of them would return an output : >>> python
Thanks fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
