typing's primary intention is "static" typing with tools like mypy.
Introspection is not primary usage.
Adding such information for every class, module, etc makes
Python slower and fatter.
But I want to make Python more swift and slim.
INADA Naoki
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kirill Baluno
2017-12-27 14:19 GMT+03:00 Kirill Balunov :
> Here I was a bit knocked down by the IPython console. Strangely, but the `
> __annotations__` is not initialized to a an empty dict when you start it,
> while in Python console it is.
>
In addition, there are some imbalance without IPython. Since modu
2017-12-27 13:54 GMT+03:00 Chris Angelico :
> This won't work. When you say "a.__type__", it means "take the *value*
> referenced by a, and look up its __type__ attribute". So it's
> equivalent to writing:
>
> (11).__type__
> (12).__type__
>
Thank you for clarification, I understand that names do
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Kirill Balunov wrote:
> Will there be any implications (or is it possible) if all variables will
> have an attribute *something like* `__type__` which by default will be
> initialized to *something like* `AnyType`. So in the case `x = 12` will be
> equivalent to `x
Will there be any implications (or is it possible) if all variables will
have an attribute *something like* `__type__` which by default will be
initialized to *something like* `AnyType`. So in the case `x = 12` will be
equivalent to `x: AnyType = 12`.
x: int
x = 12
x.__type__ # int
a, b = 11, 12
