Oh, great. Learn something new everyday.
For this, what I did was to build up a string, and then use eval on the
string. Very ugly.
Now I can simply do a reduce.
Thanks,
Brian Beck wrote:
> John Henry wrote:
> > What's the cleanest way to say:
> >
> > 1) Give me a list of the items that are
John Henry wrote:
> What's the cleanest way to say:
>
> 1) Give me a list of the items that are in all of the sets? (3 in the
> above example)
> 2) Give me a list of the items that are not in all of the sets? (1,2 in
> the above example)
>
> Thanks,
If you have an arbitrary list of sets, reduce
At Wednesday 25/10/2006 21:12, John Henry wrote:
Oops. Forgot to mention, I am still using 2.3.
try: set
except NameError: from sets import Set as set
and the code will work almost exactly the same in 2.3/2.4
> 1) Give me a list of the items that are in all of the sets? (3 in the
> above e
Aye!
I did a:
a and b and c
Bonk!
Thanks,
Tim Peters wrote:
> [John Henry]
> > If I have a bunch of sets:
> >
> > a = set((1, 2, 3))
> > b = set((2, 3))
> > c = set((1, 3))
> >
> >
> > What's the cleanest way to say:
> >
> > 1) Give me a list of the items that are in all of the sets? (3
[John Henry]
> If I have a bunch of sets:
>
> a = set((1, 2, 3))
> b = set((2, 3))
> c = set((1, 3))
>
>
> What's the cleanest way to say:
>
> 1) Give me a list of the items that are in all of the sets? (3 in the
> above example)
list(a & b & c)
> 2) Give me a list of the items that are not
Oops. Forgot to mention, I am still using 2.3.
John Henry wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> If I have a bunch of sets:
>
> a = set((1, 2, 3))
> b = set((2, 3))
> c = set((1, 3))
>
>
> What's the cleanest way to say:
>
> 1) Give me a list of the items that are in all of the sets? (3 in the
> above examp
Hi list,
If I have a bunch of sets:
a = set((1, 2, 3))
b = set((2, 3))
c = set((1, 3))
What's the cleanest way to say:
1) Give me a list of the items that are in all of the sets? (3 in the
above example)
2) Give me a list of the items that are not in all of the sets? (1,2 in
the above exam
