I had tried the global prefix in the real code (vs. the contrived
example in the post), but in the incorrect code block, which made me
think something else was up. Yes, these were supposed to be constants
that under rare circumstances were changed ;) In the end, I scrapped
the rebind approach, be
On 28 fév, 18:15, "Matthew Franz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm probably fundamentally misunderstanding the way the interpreter
> works with regard to scope, but is this the intended behavior...
>
(snip traceback)
> import os,sys
>
> SOMEGLOBAL=1
>
> def foo():
> dome=False
> if dome:
>
> I'm probably fundamentally misunderstanding the way the interpreter
> works with regard to scope, but is this the intended behavior...
>
[]
> SOMEGLOBAL:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "unboundlocal.py", line 15, in ?
> foo()
> File "unboundlocal.py", line 11, in foo
>
I'm probably fundamentally misunderstanding the way the interpreter
works with regard to scope, but is this the intended behavior...
franz-macbook:~ mdfranz$ python unboundlocal.py
('Darwin', 'franz-macbook.local', '8.8.5', 'Darwin Kernel Version
8.8.5: Mon Dec 11 19:39:17 PST 2006;
root:xnu-792.1
