Simon Cropper wrote:
> Certainly doable but
> considering the shear commonality of this task I don't understand why a
> simple script does not already exist - hence my original request for
> assistance.
I think you may have underestimated the complexity of the task in general.
To do it for a
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Simon Cropper
wrote:
> Chris,
>
> You assessment is correct. Working through the PyPI I am having better luck
> with using different terms than the old-term 'sitemap'.
>
> I have found a link to funnelweb which uses the transmogrify library (yeah,
> as if I would ha
On 09/09/11 12:59, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Simon Cropper
wrote:
At present I am definitely getting the impression that my assumption that
something like this' must out there', is wrong.
I have found a XML-Sitemaps Generator at http://www.xml-sitemaps.com,
this p
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Simon Cropper
wrote:
> At present I am definitely getting the impression that my assumption that
> something like this' must out there', is wrong.
>
> I have found a XML-Sitemaps Generator at http://www.xml-sitemaps.com,
> this page allows you to create the XML fil
On 09/09/11 12:14, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If you do decide to write your own, please consider uploading it to PyPI
under a FOSS licence.
At present I am definitely getting the impression that my assumption
that something like this' must out there', is wrong.
I am following people's links and
Simon Cropper wrote:
> Certainly doable but
> considering the shear commonality of this task I don't understand why a
> simple script does not already exist
Perhaps it isn't as common or as simple as you believe.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Simon Cropper wrote:
> 1. Being told to google-it when I explicitly stated in my initial post
> that I had been doing this and had not been able to find anything is
> just plain rude. It is unconstructive and irritating.
Why so you did. Even though I wasn't the one who told you to google it, I'll
On 09/09/11 10:32, Rhodri James wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:40:42 +0100, Simon Cropper
Ahem. You should expect a certain amount of ribbing after admitting that
your Google-fu is weak. So is mine, but hey.
I did not admit anything. I consider my ability to find this quite good
actually. Othe
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:40:42 +0100, Simon Cropper
wrote:
On 09/09/11 01:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[SNIP]
It's no harder to put the search terms into a google URL, which still
gets
the point across without being a dick about it:
> [SNIP]
[RANT]
OK I was not going to say anything but..
On 09/09/11 01:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[SNIP]
It's no harder to put the search terms into a google URL, which still gets
the point across without being a dick about it:
> [SNIP]
[RANT]
OK I was not going to say anything but...
1. Being told to google-it when I explicitly stated in my initi
10 matches
Mail list logo