On 2024-10-19 00:15:23 +0200, jak via Python-list wrote:
> Peter J. Holzer ha scritto:
> > As a trivial example, the regular expressions r"\\sout{" and r"\\sout\{"
> > are equivalent (the \ before the { is redundant). Yet
> > re.compile(s).pattern preserves the difference between the two strings.
>
Peter J. Holzer ha scritto:
As a trivial example, the regular expressions r"\\sout{" and r"\\sout\{"
are equivalent (the \ before the { is redundant). Yet
re.compile(s).pattern preserves the difference between the two strings.
Hi,
Allow me to be fussy: r"\\sout{" and r"\\sout\{" are similar bu
On 2024-10-12 08:51:57 -0400, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
> On 10/12/2024 6:59 AM, Peter J. Holzer via Python-list wrote:
> > On 2024-10-11 17:13:07 -0400, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
> > > Is there some utility function out there that can be called to show what
> > > the
> > > regul
tern)
\w+\\sub
-Original Message-
From: Python-list bounces+avi.e.gross=gmail@python.org> On
Behalf Of Gilmeh Serda via Python-list
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 10:44 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Correct syntax for pathological re.search()
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 08:3
.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Peter J. Holzer via Python-list
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2024 7:00 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Correct syntax for pathological re.search()
On 2024-10-11 17:13:07 -0400, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
> Is there some util
On 10/12/2024 6:59 AM, Peter J. Holzer via Python-list wrote:
On 2024-10-11 17:13:07 -0400, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
Is there some utility function out there that can be called to show what the
regular expression you typed in will look like by the time it is ready to be
used?
I assume
On 2024-10-11 17:13:07 -0400, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
> Is there some utility function out there that can be called to show what the
> regular expression you typed in will look like by the time it is ready to be
> used?
I assume that by "ready to be used" you mean the compiled form?
No,
dealing with a layer of backslashes.
But for simple cases, ...
Yes. It's called 'print'. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Gilmeh Serda via Python-list
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 10:44 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Correct syntax f
cases, ...
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Gilmeh Serda via Python-list
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 10:44 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Correct syntax for pathological re.search()
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 08:35:32 -0500, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
> I'
Am Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 04:59:48PM -0400 schrieb Alan Bawden via Python-list:
> Karsten Hilbert writes:
>
>Python 3.11.2 (main, Aug 26 2024, 07:20:54) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux
>Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
> information.
>>>> tex = '\
On 2024-10-08 21:59, Alan Bawden via Python-list wrote:
Karsten Hilbert writes:
Python 3.11.2 (main, Aug 26 2024, 07:20:54) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
information.
>>> tex = '\sout{'
>>> tex
Karsten Hilbert writes:
Python 3.11.2 (main, Aug 26 2024, 07:20:54) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
information.
>>> tex = '\sout{'
>>> tex
'\\sout{'
>>>
Am I missing something ?
Am Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 08:07:04PM +0100 schrieb MRAB via Python-list:
> >unwanted_tex = '\sout{'
> >if unwanted_tex not in line: do_something_with_libreoffice()
> >
> That should be:
>
> unwanted_tex = r'\sout{'
Hm.
Python 3.11.2 (main, Aug 26 2024, 07:20:54) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux
On 2024-10-07 14:35, Michael F. Stemper via Python-list wrote:
I'm trying to discard lines that include the string "\sout{" (which is TeX, for
those who are curious. I have tried:
if not re.search("\sout{", line):
if not re.search("\sout\{", line):
if not re.search("\\sout{", line):
On 2024-10-08 19:30, Karsten Hilbert via Python-list wrote:
Am Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:35:32AM -0500 schrieb Michael F. Stemper via
Python-list:
I'm trying to discard lines that include the string "\sout{" (which is TeX, for
those who are curious. I have tried:
if not re.search("\sout{", lin
Am Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:35:32AM -0500 schrieb Michael F. Stemper via
Python-list:
> I'm trying to discard lines that include the string "\sout{" (which is TeX,
> for
> those who are curious. I have tried:
> if not re.search("\sout{", line):
> if not re.search("\sout\{", line):
> if not
On 2024-10-07, Stefan Ram wrote:
> "Michael F. Stemper" wrote or quoted:
>>For now, I'll use the "r" in a cargo-cult fashion, until I decide which
>>syntax I prefer. (Is there any reason that one or the other is preferable?)
>
> I'd totally go with the r-style notation!
>
> It's got one bumme
I'm trying to discard lines that include the string "\sout{" (which is TeX, for
those who are curious. I have tried:
if not re.search("\sout{", line):
if not re.search("\sout\{", line):
if not re.search("\\sout{", line):
if not re.search("\\sout\{", line):
But the lines with that string k
r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
> "Michael F. Stemper" wrote or quoted:
>
> path = r'C:\Windows\example' + '\\'
>
You could even omit the '+'. Then the concatenation is done at parsing time
instead of run time.
--
Pieter van Oostrum
www: http://pieter.vanoostrum.org/
PGP key: [8DA
On 07/10/2024 08.56, Stefan Ram wrote:
"Michael F. Stemper" wrote or quoted:
if not re.search("\\sout\{", line):
So, if you're not down to slap an "r" before your string literals,
you're going to end up doubling down on every backslash.
Never heard of that before, but it did the trick
20 matches
Mail list logo
