On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:14 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The documentation for the ast module states that it "helps to find out
>> programmatically what the current grammar looks like". I can't find
>> any reference (even when reading the code) on how you should go about
>> t
> My confusion starts with the fact that I'm not sure if all Python 2.4
> code is going to be syntactically valid 2.6 code.
That's not so much a matter of confusion, but of careful research.
I *think* all code that is syntactically correct in 2.4 is also
syntactically correct in 2.6 - but only be
> The documentation for the ast module states that it "helps to find out
> programmatically what the current grammar looks like". I can't find
> any reference (even when reading the code) on how you should go about
> this, other than checking the sys.version number and reading up on the
> changes.
Orestis Markou wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Orestis Markou wrote:
Hello,
I'm the developer of PySmell ( http://github.com/orestis/pysmell ), a
static analysis/intellisense provider for Python. I am targeting
Python 2.4 code so I'm using the comp
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Orestis Markou wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm the developer of PySmell ( http://github.com/orestis/pysmell ), a
>> static analysis/intellisense provider for Python. I am targeting
>> Python 2.4 code so I'm using the compiler pa
Orestis Markou wrote:
Hello,
I'm the developer of PySmell ( http://github.com/orestis/pysmell ), a
static analysis/intellisense provider for Python. I am targeting
Python 2.4 code so I'm using the compiler package.
I've been toying around yesterday with the ast module in Python 2.6
and it seems
Hello,
I'm the developer of PySmell ( http://github.com/orestis/pysmell ), a
static analysis/intellisense provider for Python. I am targeting
Python 2.4 code so I'm using the compiler package.
I've been toying around yesterday with the ast module in Python 2.6
and it seems much more cleaner. One
