Re: Trying to compile Python 3.5 on Linux Mint 19, getting compiler warnings and failing tests

On 2/18/2019 3:35 PM, Marcin G wrote: Hmm. From looking at your full log (THANK YOU for posting that, btw - so many people don't), it looks like an issue with certificate checking. Might be a bug in the test itself. Does the same thing happen with a more recent Python build? It could be a weirdne

Re: Trying to compile Python 3.5 on Linux Mint 19, getting compiler warnings and failing tests

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:55 AM Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2019-02-18, Chris Angelico wrote: > > > Hmm. From looking at your full log (THANK YOU for posting that, btw - > > so many people don't), it looks like an issue with certificate > > checking. Might be a bug in the test itself. Does the sa

Re: Trying to compile Python 3.5 on Linux Mint 19, getting compiler warnings and failing tests

On 2019-02-18, Chris Angelico wrote: > Hmm. From looking at your full log (THANK YOU for posting that, btw - > so many people don't), it looks like an issue with certificate > checking. Might be a bug in the test itself. Does the same thing > happen with a more recent Python build? It could be a

Re: Trying to compile Python 3.5 on Linux Mint 19, getting compiler warnings and failing tests

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:36 AM Marcin G wrote: > > Hmm. From looking at your full log (THANK YOU for posting that, btw - > so many people don't), it looks like an issue with certificate > checking. Might be a bug in the test itself. Does the same thing > happen with a more recent Python build? It

RE: Trying to compile Python 3.5 on Linux Mint 19, getting compiler warnings and failing tests

Hmm. From looking at your full log (THANK YOU for posting that, btw - so many people don't), it looks like an issue with certificate checking. Might be a bug in the test itself. Does the same thing happen with a more recent Python build? It could be a weirdness with specific versions of OpenSSL. H

Re: Trying to compile Python 3.5 on Linux Mint 19, getting compiler warnings and failing tests

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:23 AM Marcin G wrote: > > My boss wants my code to run on Python 3.5, so I thought I'd install 3.5 to > be able to ascertain this. > > But Linux Mint 19 ships with Python 3.6 and python.org only provides source > code for 3.5.6

Trying to compile Python 3.5 on Linux Mint 19, getting compiler warnings and failing tests

My boss wants my code to run on Python 3.5, so I thought I'd install 3.5 to be able to ascertain this. But Linux Mint 19 ships with Python 3.6 and python.org only provides source code for 3.5.6. So I thought I'd try compiling 3.5.6 myself.

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

26.11.17 21:46, wojtek.m...@gmail.com пише: On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 1:00:19 AM UTC+1, Terry Reedy wrote: You must be trying to compile 2.7. There may be Linux distributions that compile this way. You're right, I need 2.7. Any hint which distro has got these settings? UCS-2 is used b

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, 19:46 , wrote: > On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 1:00:19 AM UTC+1, Terry Reedy wrote: > I have to fix a bug in my C extension that appears only in UCS-2 python > (i.e. Windows). I can reboot to Windows and debug there, but it's pain > in a neck for various reasons. > In my o

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

Mody) On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 3:43:29 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wojtek.mula wrote: > > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > > > > import sys > > print sys.maxunicode

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 1:00:19 AM UTC+1, Terry Reedy wrote: > You must be trying to compile 2.7. There may be Linux distributions > that compile this way. You're right, I need 2.7. Any hint which distro has got these settings? > If you want to seriously work with unicode, many recommend

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 3:43:29 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wojtek.mula wrote: > > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > > > > import sys > > print sys.maxunicode > > >

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On 11/25/17 5:05 PM, wojtek.m...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > >import sys >print sys.maxunicode > > This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. > What options have I pass to th

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On 11/25/2017 5:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wrote: >> Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally >> uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: >> >>import sys >>print sys.maxunicode >> >> This is enabled in Windows, but I want the s

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

may be Linux distributions that > compile this way. If you want to use, or ever encounter, non-BMP chars, > using surrogate pairs is problematical. By my reading of the official UCS-2 > docs, Python's old 16-bit unicode implementation is not fully compliant. > Others have claimed th

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

Le dimanche 26 novembre 2017 05:53:55 UTC+1, Rustom Mody a ÄCcritâ : > On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 3:43:29 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wojtek.mula wrote: > > > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > > > uses UCS-2. Such a simple co

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wrote: > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > > import sys > print sys.maxunicode > > This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. > What options have I pass to the configur

Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: import sys print sys.maxunicode This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. What options have I pass to the configure script? w. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listi

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 1:00:19 AM UTC+1, Terry Reedy wrote: > You must be trying to compile 2.7. There may be Linux distributions > that compile this way. You're right, I need 2.7. Any hint which distro has got these settings? > If you want to seriously work with unicode, many recommen

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

Le dimanche 26 novembre 2017 05:53:55 UTC+1, Rustom Mody a ÄCcritâ : > On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 3:43:29 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wojtek.mula wrote: > > > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > > > uses UCS-2. Such a simple co

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

26.11.17 01:59, Terry Reedy D¿D,ÑêDµ: > On 11/25/2017 5:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM,â wrote: >>> Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally >>> uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: >>> >>> â â import sys >>> â â print sys.maxunicode

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Rustom Mody wrote: > On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 3:43:29 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wojtek.mula wrote: >> > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally >> > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 655

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 3:43:29 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wojtek.mula wrote: > > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > > > > import sys > > print sys.maxunicode > > >

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On 11/25/17 5:05 PM, wojtek.m...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > >import sys >print sys.maxunicode > > This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. > What options have I pass to th

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

may be Linux distributions that > compile this way. If you want to use, or ever encounter, non-BMP chars, > using surrogate pairs is problematical. By my reading of the official UCS-2 > docs, Python's old 16-bit unicode implementation is not fully compliant. > Others have claimed th

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On 11/25/2017 5:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wrote: >> Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally >> uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: >> >>import sys >>print sys.maxunicode >> >> This is enabled in Windows, but I want the s

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wrote: > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > > import sys > print sys.maxunicode > > This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. > What options have I pass to the configur

Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: import sys print sys.maxunicode This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. What options have I pass to the configure script? w. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listi

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

26.11.17 01:59, Terry Reedy пише: On 11/25/2017 5:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM,  wrote: Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535:    import sys    print sys.maxunicode This is enabled in Windows,

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Rustom Mody wrote: > On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 3:43:29 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wojtek.mula wrote: >> > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally >> > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 655

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 3:43:29 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wojtek.mula wrote: > > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > > > > import sys > > print sys.maxunicode > > >

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On 11/25/17 5:05 PM, wojtek.m...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: import sys print sys.maxunicode This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. What options have I pass to the configure

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

may be Linux distributions that > compile this way. If you want to use, or ever encounter, non-BMP chars, > using surrogate pairs is problematical. By my reading of the official UCS-2 > docs, Python's old 16-bit unicode implementation is not fully compliant. > Others have claimed th

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On 11/25/2017 5:12 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wrote: Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: import sys print sys.maxunicode This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. What

Re: Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:05 AM, wrote: > Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally > uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: > > import sys > print sys.maxunicode > > This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. > What options have I pass to the configur

Compile Python 3 interpreter to force 2-byte unicode

Hi, my goal is to obtain an interpreter that internally uses UCS-2. Such a simple code should print 65535: import sys print sys.maxunicode This is enabled in Windows, but I want the same in Linux. What options have I pass to the configure script? w. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listin

Re: Help configuring visual studio to compile python extensions

On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 8:58:59 AM UTC-6, stephen...@gmail.com wrote: > I've installed Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0. Here are the steps I've been > taking. > > My python version is Python 3.4.2 (v3.4.2:ab2c023a9432, Oct 6 2014, > 22:16:31) [MSC v.1600 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32. > > (Sorry

Re: Help configuring visual studio to compile python extensions

On 09/01/2015 22:14, stephen.bou...@gmail.com wrote: This page helped me sort everything out: http://www.falatic.com/index.php/120/a-guide-to-building-python-2-x-and-3-x-extensions-for-windows. That's good to know both for you and me but in future could you please quote some context, thanks

Re: Help configuring visual studio to compile python extensions

This page helped me sort everything out: http://www.falatic.com/index.php/120/a-guide-to-building-python-2-x-and-3-x-extensions-for-windows. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Help configuring visual studio to compile python extensions

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > I'll admit to being a little annoyed that scandir says it supports Python 3 > but only provides a 2.7 exe on pypi. If you can wait for 3.5, you might find it in the standard library. PEP 471 was accepted, and I believe that means scandir wil

Re: Help configuring visual studio to compile python extensions

On 09/01/2015 14:58, stephen.bou...@gmail.com wrote: I've installed Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0. Here are the steps I've been taking. My python version is Python 3.4.2 (v3.4.2:ab2c023a9432, Oct 6 2014, 22:16:31) [MSC v.1600 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32. (Sorry for the long output.) cd "c:\Pro

Help configuring visual studio to compile python extensions

I've installed Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0. Here are the steps I've been taking. My python version is Python 3.4.2 (v3.4.2:ab2c023a9432, Oct 6 2014, 22:16:31) [MSC v.1600 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32. (Sorry for the long output.) >cd "c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0"\vc >vcva

Re: compile python 3.3 with bz2 support

sudo apt-get install libbz2-dev Python-3.4.1$ ./configure --with-pydebug --with-bz2 --prefix=/usr && make -j2 On Saturday, 22 December 2012 17:06:51 UTC+1, Benjamin Kaplan wrote: > On Dec 21, 2012 1:31 AM, "Isml" <7606...@qq.com> wrote: > > > > > &g

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

to create a compiler that can compile Python code >> to machinecode? > > The main issue is that python has dynamic typing. The type of object > that is referenced by a particular name can vary, and there's no way (in > general) to know at compile time what the type of object

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Mar 4, 2013 3:02 PM, "CM" wrote: > > > > The main issue is that python has dynamic typing. The type of object > > that is referenced by a particular name can vary, and there's no way > > (in general) to know at compile time what the type of object "foo" is. > > > > That makes generating object

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, CM wrote: > >> The main issue is that python has dynamic typing. The type of object >> that is referenced by a particular name can vary, and there's no way >> (in general) to know at compile time what the type of object "foo" is. >> >> That makes generating object

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On 3/4/2013 5:55 PM, CM wrote: Could you help me understand this better? For example, if you have this line in the Python program: foo = 'some text' bar = {'apple':'fruit'} If the interpreter can determine at runtime that foo is a string and bar is a dict, why can't the compiler figure that o

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 6:55:06 AM UTC+8, CM wrote: > > The main issue is that python has dynamic typing.  The type of object > > > that is referenced by a particular name can vary, and there's no way > > > (in general) to know at compile time what the type of object "foo" is. > > > > > > Tha

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

> The main issue is that python has dynamic typing.  The type of object > that is referenced by a particular name can vary, and there's no way > (in general) to know at compile time what the type of object "foo" is. > > That makes generating object code to manipulate "foo" very difficult. Could y

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On 2013-02-28, kramer65 wrote: > I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one > thing I cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C > and C++. why is it impossible to create a compiler that can compile > Python code to machinecode? The m

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:48:34 +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Steven D'Aprano, 01.03.2013 04:47: >> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:03:09 +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> >>> The most widely used static Python compiler is Cython >> >> Cython is not a Python compiler. Cython code will not run in a vanilla >> P

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

Steven D'Aprano, 01.03.2013 04:47: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:03:09 +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote: > >> The most widely used static Python compiler is Cython > > Cython is not a Python compiler. Cython code will not run in a vanilla > Python implementation. It has different keywords and syntax, e.g.:

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

kramer65於 2013年3月1日星期五UTC+8上午4時25分07秒寫道： > Hello, > > > > I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing I > cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. why is > it impossible to create a compiler that can compile Pyt

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Mar 1, 6:25 am, kramer65 wrote: > There are compilers for languages like C and C++. why > is it impossible to create a compiler that can compile > Python code to machinecode? This is a nice site list a lot of current approaches to that subject: http://compilers.pydata.org/

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Mar 1, 1:47 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Cython is not a Python compiler. Cython code will not run in a vanilla > Python implementation. It has different keywords and syntax, e.g.: > > cdef inline int func(double num): >     ... > > which gives SyntaxError in a Python compiler. Cython has had

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:25:07 -0800, kramer65 wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing > I cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. > why is it impossible to create a compiler that can comp

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:03:09 +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote: > The most widely used static Python compiler is Cython Cython is not a Python compiler. Cython code will not run in a vanilla Python implementation. It has different keywords and syntax, e.g.: cdef inline int func(double num): ...

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:50:00 -0500, Matty Sarro wrote: > Python is an interpreted language, not a compiled language. Actually, *languages* are neither interpreted nor compiled. A language is an abstract description of behaviour and syntax. Whether something is interpreted or compiled or a mixtu

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:25:07 -0800, kramer65 wrote: > I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing > I cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. > why is it impossible to create a compiler that can compile Python code > to m

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

The subject line is wrong. There are multiple compilers. Someone just listed some of them today in another post. On 2/28/2013 3:50 PM, Matty Sarro wrote: Python is an interpreted language, not a compiled language. A language is just a language. Implementations are implementations*. That asid

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On do, feb 28, 2013 at 12:25:07pm -0800, kramer65 wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing I > cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. why is > it impossible to create a compiler that can co

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

> I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing I > cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. why is > it impossible to create a compiler that can compile Python code to > machinecode? Not exactly what you describe, but hav

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On 02/28/2013 03:25 PM, kramer65 wrote: Hello, I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing I cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. why is it impossible to create a compiler that can compile Python code to machinecode? My reasoni

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

Stefan Behnel, 28.02.2013 22:03: > there are also a couple of projects that do > dynamic runtime compilation, most notably PyPy and Numba. Oh, and HotPy, I keep forgetting about that. > You may want to take a look at the Python implementations page, > specifically the list of Python compilers: >

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Matty Sarro wrote: > C (your example) was intended for very low level programming, things like > operating systems, device drivers, networking stacks, where the speed of a > compiled executable and direct access to hardware was a necessity. That's > what Dennis Ritc

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

kramer65, 28.02.2013 21:25: > I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing > I cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. > why is it impossible to create a compiler that can compile Python code > to machinecode? All projec

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing I > cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. why is > it impossible to create a compiler that can compile Python code to > machinecode? > > My reasoning is as follows: > When GCC compiles a prog

Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

Hello, I'm using Python for a while now and I love it. There is just one thing I cannot understand. There are compilers for languages like C and C++. why is it impossible to create a compiler that can compile Python code to machinecode? My reasoning is as follows: When GCC compiles a pr

?????? compile python 3.3 with bz2 support

-- ??: "Isml"<76069...@qq.com>; : 2012??12??24??(??????) ????11:21 ??: "Benjamin Kaplan"; "Python List"; : ?? compile python 3.3 with bz2 support Thanks for your reply.According to your advice, I tried ag

?????? compile python 3.3 with bz2 support

? -- ??: "Benjamin Kaplan"; : 2012??12??23??(??) 0:06 ??: "Python List"; : Re: compile python 3.3 with bz2 support On Dec 21, 2012 1:31 AM, "Isml" <76069...@qq.com> wrote: > > hi, everyone: >

Re: compile python 3.3 with bz2 support

On Dec 21, 2012 1:31 AM, "Isml" <76069...@qq.com> wrote: > > hi, everyone: > I want to compile python 3.3 with bz2 support on RedHat 5.5 but fail to do that. Here is how I do it: > 1. download bzip2 and compile it(make、make -f Makefile_libbz2_so、make install)

Re: compile python 3.3 with bz2 support

On Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:27:54 PM UTC-8, Isml wrote: >     I want to compile python 3.3 with bz2 support on RedHat 5.5 but fail to > do that. Here is how I do it: >     1. download bzip2 and compile it(make、make -f Makefile_libbz2_so、make > install) Why can't you use

Re: compile python 3.3 with bz2 support on RedHat 5.5

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Isml <76069...@qq.com> wrote: > By the way, RedHat 5.5 has a built-in python 2.4.3. Would it be a problem? You may want to consider using 'make altinstall' rather than 'make install'. That way, you don't stomp all over the system Python (so system scripts that expe

Re: compile python 3.3 with bz2 support on RedHat 5.5

On Friday, 21 December 2012 12:05:57 UTC+5:30, Isml wrote: > hi, everyone: >     I want to compile python 3.3 with bz2 support on RedHat 5.5 but fail to > do that. Here is how I do it: >     1、download bzip2 and compile it(make、make -f Makefile_libbz2_so、make > install) >    

compile python 3.3 with bz2 support on RedHat 5.5

hi, everyone: I want to compile python 3.3 with bz2 support on RedHat 5.5 but fail to do that. Here is how I do it: 1??download bzip2 and compile it(make??make -f Makefile_libbz2_so??make install) 2??chang to python 3.3 source directory : ./configure --with-bz2=/usr/local/include

compile python 3.3 with bz2 support

hi, everyone: I want to compile python 3.3 with bz2 support on RedHat 5.5 but fail to do that. Here is how I do it: 1. download bzip2 and compile it(make??make -f Makefile_libbz2_so??make install) 2.chang to python 3.3 source directory : ./configure --with-bz2=/usr/local/include

Unable to compile Python 2.7.3 in Cygwin

Hi, I'm trying to compile Python in Cygwin, with little luck. I've posted the ugliness in this link. Thoughts? http://bin.cakephp.org/view/176472400 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Compile python code into a dll

Also, and sometimes google does kind of fail you, but straight from your question, I just type in this section of what you wrote: 'Python code that I would like to compile into a dll' Yours comes up as well within that search,but so do quite a few others related to it. > > -- Best Regards, Da

Re: Compile python code into a dll

Thank you all for your help. I'm going to try Cython. Regards Rolf On 10/09/12 14:15, Rolf Wester wrote: Hi, I have Python code that I would like to compile into a dll (I have to deliver a C/C++ callable dll and I don't want to reimpelement the Python code in C/C++). It's not for extending Py

Re: Compile python code into a dll

On 9/10/2012 8:15 AM, Rolf Wester wrote: I have Python code that I would like to compile into a dll (I have to deliver a C/C++ callable dll and I don't want to reimpelement the Python code in C/C++). It's not for extending Python but I want to call the Python functions and classes from C/C++. It

Re: Compile python code into a dll

> I have Python code that I would like to compile into a dll (I have to See http://docs.python.org/extending/embedding.html. You can pack your code in a zip file and load it from the DLL entry point (something like what py2exe does). See also the Freeze tool - http://wiki.python.org/moin/Freeze

Re: Compile python code into a dll

On Monday, 10 September 2012 17:45:11 UTC+5:30, Rolf Wester wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have Python code that I would like to compile into a dll (I have to > > deliver a C/C++ callable dll and I don't want to reimpelement the Python > > code in C/C++). It's not for extending Python but I want to

Compile python code into a dll

Hi, I have Python code that I would like to compile into a dll (I have to deliver a C/C++ callable dll and I don't want to reimpelement the Python code in C/C++). It's not for extending Python but I want to call the Python functions and classes from C/C++. It's more like extending C/C++ with

Re: Where is the lastest step by step guide to compile Python into an executable?

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Prasad, Ramit wrote: >> > Where is the lastest step by step guide to compile Python into an >> executable? >> >> Google. > > I think you mean the Internet as Google is just an index. > Unless you are referring to Google's ca

RE: Where is the lastest step by step guide to compile Python into an executable?

> > Where is the lastest step by step guide to compile Python into an > executable? > > > > Regards. > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > Google. I think you mean the Internet as Google is just an index. Unless you are referrin

Re: Where is the lastest step by step guide to compile Python into an executable?

On 07/06/2012 11:05, David Shi wrote: Hi, folks. Where is the lastest step by step guide to compile Python into an executable? Regards. David Google. -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Where is the lastest step by step guide to compile Python into an executable?

Hi, folks. Where is the lastest step by step guide to compile Python into an executable? Regards. David -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Where is the latest step by step guide to use Jython to compile Python into Java?

Narayanaswamy, Mohan, 04.06.2012 16:56: > Python is dynanmic programming (but strongly typed), java is > static-typed language. Currently it is not possible to convert python > into java, since python types are dynamically identified, not identified > during compilation. That's not entirely true.

Re: Where is the latest step by step guide to use Jython to compile Python into Java?

David Shi, 04.06.2012 16:36: > Where is the latest step by step guide to use Jython to compile Python into > Java? I don't think there is such a thing, simply because Jython does not compile Python into Java. > I found that it was very confusing by reading not updated text. It

Where is the latest step by step guide to use Jython to compile Python into Java?

Hello, Where is the latest step by step guide to use Jython to compile Python into Java? I found that it was very confusing by reading not updated text. Please help. Regards. David -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: // compile python core //

Excerpts from victor lucio's message of Sun Jun 26 02:01:27 -0400 2011: > Hi > > I would like to know how to compile the python core. > I am going to remove some modules of it to have a thin python. > > Where could I find further information about it? > I'm guessing you're going to want to go t

// compile python core //

Hi I would like to know how to compile the python core. I am going to remove some modules of it to have a thin python. Where could I find further information about it? I would be grateful for your suggestions Waldemar -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Compile python executable only for package deployment on Linux

Hi Stefan, Well, the idea is similar to package tools like pyinstaller or cx_freeze. There approach is slightly different then what I intend to do here. You have to pass the name of the script to python executable("python main.py") in order to execute it. What I mean here is to create python exec

Re: Compile python executable only for package deployment on Linux

King, 20.07.2010 18:45: I have created a simple tool(python script) that creates a self sufficient package ready for deployment. Current implementation is based on shell scripting to set environment for the app and finally execute "python main.py". I am planning to convert "main.py" into an exec

Compile python executable only for package deployment on Linux

Hi, I have created a simple tool(python script) that creates a self sufficient package ready for deployment. Current implementation is based on shell scripting to set environment for the app and finally execute "python main.py". I am planning to convert "main.py" into an executable. The plan is t

Re: unable to compile Python 2.6.4 on AIX using gcc

ersions of python on that machine. I would appreciate any help. Do I need to set the exec_prefix as well? Thanks. Mark Dickinson wrote: On Nov 3, 10:40 pm, chuck wrote: Hello -- I am trying to compile Python 2.6.4 on a Power 5 PC with AIX 5.3. Here are the settings: Take a look at: http:/

Re: unable to compile Python 2.6.4 on AIX using gcc

On Nov 3, 10:40 pm, chuck wrote: > Hello -- I am trying to compile Python 2.6.4 on a Power 5 PC with AIX > 5.3.  Here are the settings: > > export OBJECT_MODE=64 > export AR="ar -X64" > export MAKE=/usr/bin/gmake > export CC="gcc" > export CFLAGS="

unable to compile Python 2.6.4 on AIX using gcc

Hello -- I am trying to compile Python 2.6.4 on a Power 5 PC with AIX 5.3. Here are the settings: export OBJECT_MODE=64 export AR="ar -X64" export MAKE=/usr/bin/gmake export CC="gcc" export CFLAGS="-maix64 -O2 -g -mcpu=power5" export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64 -L/

Re: I am trying to compile python 2.6.2 on my Mac

On Jul 26, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Chris Rebert wrote: On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Jessica R Smith wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile Python 2.6.2 on my Mac which has os/x 10.5.7 I downloaded python 2.6.2 from here: - http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.6.2/Python-2.6.2.tar.bz2 I unpacked

Re: I am trying to compile python 2.6.2 on my Mac

Jessica Smith schrieb: Chris thanks!! other members: I read this: - http://chrismiles.livejournal.com/25648.html I did this: - install mac ports - port install readline - vi setup.py def detect_modules(self): # Ensure that /usr/local is always used add_dir_to_list

  1   2   >