In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marco
Nawijn wrote:
> The problem I face is that the implementation of the application class
> is completely different for the local and remote case. The local case is a
> straightforward implemenation using the subprocess module, the remote
> case is a CORBA implem
On Aug 29, 3:03 pm, "Marshall T. Vandegrift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Marco Nawijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem I face is that the implementation of the application class
> > is completely different for the local and remote case. The local case
> > is a straightforward implemenat
Marco Nawijn a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have a hard time figuring out an elegant and efficient design for
> the following problem.
>
> I am working on automation of structural design problems. In the
> majority of cases, this boils down to executing programs in batch in
> one or more loops. The scr
Marco Nawijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a hard time figuring out an elegant and efficient design for
>the following problem.
What you want is known as the factory pattern.
> [ ... ] I would
>like the following (pseudo)-code to work:
>
>app = Application('patran') # Run o
Marco Nawijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem I face is that the implementation of the application class
> is completely different for the local and remote case. The local case
> is a straightforward implemenation using the subprocess module, the
> remote case is a CORBA implementation. S
Hello,
I have a hard time figuring out an elegant and efficient design for
the following problem.
I am working on automation of structural design problems. In the
majority of cases, this boils down to executing programs in batch in
one or more loops. The scripts to control the execution differ fr
