As a reference here is a functional implementation of conways GOL.
http://programmablelife.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/conways-game-of-life-in-clojure.html
The author first does it in clojure and then transliterates it to python.
Just good for a different view.
Sayth
--
https://mail.python.org/mail
Thanks for the opinion. I should add that is not my code in first post it's
the code from Rosetta on how to do Conway's GOL.
I thought it looked ugly.
Sayth
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:17 PM, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
> Just looking for your opinion on style would you write it like this
> continually calling range or would you use enumerate instead, or neither
> (something far better) ?
I can't comment on your specific code because there's too much noise to
Also not using enumerate but no ugly for i range implementation
this one from code review uses a generator on live cells only.
http://codereview.stackexchange.com/a/108121/104381
def neighbors(cell):
x, y = cell
yield x - 1, y - 1
yield x, y - 1
yield x + 1, y - 1
yield
Looking at various Python implementations of Conway's game of life.
I came across one on rosetta using defaultdict.
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life#Python
Just looking for your opinion on style would you write it like this continually
calling range or would you use enumerate
