On Thu, 06 May 2010 12:40:16 +0200, Richard Lamboj wrote:
> Thank you for the nice sample, but what is with multiple inheritance in
> your sample? I mean the super call. Why not _MyClass.blah(self, arg).
super() should work correctly when you have more complicated multiple
inheritance, while cal
Richard Lamboj wrote:
>
>Thank you for the nice sample, but what is with multiple inheritance in your
>sample? I mean the super call. Why not _MyClass.blah(self, arg).
Because then I have to remember to change the name if I should happen to
change the base class, or copy this code into another c
Am Thursday 06 May 2010 12:02:47 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
> On Thu, 06 May 2010 11:24:49 +0200, Richard Lamboj wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > what should i take:
> > - nested functions:
> > class MyClass(object)
> > def blah(self):
> > def blub(var1, var2):
> > do something...
> > blub
On Thu, 06 May 2010 11:24:49 +0200, Richard Lamboj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what should i take:
> - nested functions:
> class MyClass(object)
> def blah(self):
> def blub(var1, var2):
> do something...
> blub(1, 5)
The disadvantage of nested functions is that it is harder to test th
Hello,
what should i take:
- nested functions:
class MyClass(object)
def blah(self):
def blub(var1, var2):
do something...
blub(1, 5)
or
class MyClass(object)
def blah(self):
def _blub(var1, var2):
do something...
_blub(1, 5)
- "private" functions:
class MyCl
