Re: Clarifications on compiling for Windows

2010-01-09 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> First of all, is the Windows FAQ fairly up to date? Fairly, yes. > Should people be > referring to section 6 if they are going to build an application with > an embedded Python interpreter? I think that's very selective in its view of problems - why would I be using SWIG, for example? (yet the

Re: Clarifications on compiling for Windows

2010-01-09 Thread Jason Scheirer
On Jan 7, 10:51 pm, Mensanator wrote: > On Jan 8, 12:19 am, peteshinners wrote: > > > > > > > > > My presentation for Pycon is coming together, but I need to make sure > > my information about compiling Python and Python extensions for > > Windows is correct. I'm really only experienced with this

Re: Clarifications on compiling for Windows

2010-01-07 Thread Mensanator
On Jan 8, 12:19 am, peteshinners wrote: > My presentation for Pycon is coming together, but I need to make sure > my information about compiling Python and Python extensions for > Windows is correct. I'm really only experienced with this on the Linux > side of things. > > First of all, is the Wind

Clarifications on compiling for Windows

2010-01-07 Thread peteshinners
My presentation for Pycon is coming together, but I need to make sure my information about compiling Python and Python extensions for Windows is correct. I'm really only experienced with this on the Linux side of things. First of all, is the Windows FAQ fairly up to date? Should people be referrin