Zero Piraeus wrote:
> A dissenting view [and a Kill Bill spoiler, of sorts]:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdWF7kd1tNo
A fun diatribe, sure, but still an outsider view that is in direct
conflict with how the characters are actually portrayed.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
:
On 4 October 2011 00:43, alex23 wrote:
> rantingrick wrote:
>> Clark Kent is just an assumed identity of Superman.
>
> Actually, he identifies with Clark Kent, Superman is the secret
> identity.
>
> You're thinking of Batman, for whom Bruce Wayne is the mask.
A dissenting view [and a Kill Bil
rantingrick wrote:
> TrueWiseObserver: Wrong pseudo. Superman will ALWAYS be superman even
> if he wears a dress and stilettos. Clark Kent is just an assumed
> identity of Superman.
Actually, he identifies with Clark Kent, Superman is the secret
identity.
You're thinking of Batman, for whom Bruc
On Oct 3, 11:27 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> PhysicsExpert: Super-speed wouldn't work, the acceleration required to
> achieve it would burn up his surroundings!
For some definition of "super-speed" i suppose. Since we're bouncing
around the "relatives" here we need to consider this one also -> Su
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:54 AM, rantingrick wrote:
> Observer: Why is it that Clark Kent and Superman are never in the same
> place at the same time?
> ComicFanboy: Because Clark Kent IS Kal-El's secret identity duh!
> PuesdoWiseObserver: Wait a minute fanboy, they ARE in the same place
> at the s
On Oct 2, 4:43 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> In all cases, we can be sure that the contradiction between the pair of
> statements are genuine contradictions and not mere apparent
> contradictions caused by "narrow perspective" or incomplete or erroneous
> knowledge.
Observer: Why is it that Clark
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:03:07 -0700, rusi wrote:
> On Oct 2, 8:03 am, Steven D'Aprano +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> By the way, who removed the OT label from the subject line? Please
>> don't unless it actually comes back on topic.
>>
>> DevPlayer wrote:
>> > I still assert that contr
On Oct 2, 8:03 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> By the way, who removed the OT label from the subject line? Please don't
> unless it actually comes back on topic.
>
> DevPlayer wrote:
> > I still assert that contradiction is caused by narrow perspective.
>
> There's no doubt that some *apparent* contr
Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> By the way, who removed the OT label from the subject line?
>
> Probably nobody "removed" it, they just replied to some earlier
> message that didn't have it.
I started the "Benefit and belief" sub-thread, changing the subject line
from "suggested
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
By the way, who removed the OT label from the subject line?
Probably nobody "removed" it, they just replied to some earlier
message that didn't have it.
Despite the term, a newsgroup thread is not a linear structure,
it's a tree. Changing the subject line on one branch d
By the way, who removed the OT label from the subject line? Please don't
unless it actually comes back on topic.
DevPlayer wrote:
> I still assert that contradiction is caused by narrow perspective.
There's no doubt that some *apparent* contradictions are caused by lack of
correct information.
11 matches
Mail list logo
