On Monday 23 February 2009 03:50:57 pm tav wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> As an attempt to convince Python-Dev of the merits of a
> functions-based approach to security in Python, I've come up with a
> simple challenge.
>
While I'm almost excited that you are tackling the problem of python's
security, I f
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:20 -0800, Paul McNett wrote:
> tav wrote:
> > I'm keen to know your experiences even if you don't manage to write to
> > the filesystem -- and especially if you do!
>
> Does it count when it breaks some standard libs that aren't even trying to
> write to
> the filesystem
tav wrote:
I'm keen to know your experiences even if you don't manage to write to
the filesystem -- and especially if you do!
Does it count when it breaks some standard libs that aren't even trying to write to
the filesystem?
mac:ss pmcnett$ python sbs_studio.py pkm
Traceback (most recent ca
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:50 +, tav wrote:
> I'm keen to know your experiences even if you don't manage to write to
> the filesystem -- and especially if you do!
>
er sorry, but:
from safelite import FileReader
reload(__builtins__)
f = open("/home/tim/nano.save","w")
f.write("oops")
f.close()
Please use this attached updated safelite.py
Victor Stinner got the dinner by using the reload builtin =)
Good luck!
--
love, tav
plex:espians/tav | t...@espians.com | +44 (0) 7809 569 369
http://tav.espians.com | http://twitter.com/tav | skype:tavespian
"""
Please try and break this.
On a fr
Hey all,
As an attempt to convince Python-Dev of the merits of a
functions-based approach to security in Python, I've come up with a
simple challenge.
If enough smart hackers look at this and it holds up, Guido promises
to accept a patch which would enable this on both App Engine and
future Pytho
