On 2006-03-20, Sathyaish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>And firing up a news client, posting a message, and /waiting/
>> for a response isn't? In most cases, you could have read half
>> the language reference manual in the time it takes to get an
>> online response.
>
> Posting a question in the new
Thanks for the encouragement, Steve. I am learning Python out of
earnest; I am intrigued by several languages such as Ruby, Python and
Lisp.
At work, I program VB6 (used to), VB.NET, C# and C over the Win32
platform.
> that Sathyaish's time is more important than your time, of course.
LOL. Cer
Duncan Booth wrote:
>> 2) A search in the same document you are reading takes you "off" and
>> "adrift", and as such, is equivalant to a task-switch, because you're
>> already reading some material from the same help file and are stuck at
>> some point.
>
> I've tried reading this several times an
Sathyaish wrote:
> Thanks, Peter. I do use the interpreter alongside while reading the
> documentation and also try out the examples. It was just a matter of
> chance that for this particular situation, I did not.
>
> Thank you for the answers, everyone. I hope I am still welcome here for
> more q
Thanks, Peter. I do use the interpreter alongside while reading the
documentation and also try out the examples. It was just a matter of
chance that for this particular situation, I did not.
Thank you for the answers, everyone. I hope I am still welcome here for
more questions.
--
http://mail.py
Sathyaish wrote:
> OK, I get it. Just stop whining endlessly about it, guys.
Relax. Take what's in it for you and forget about the rest.
> I *do* use the interpreter. I posted a question here.
And I showed you an easy way to answer it yourself. Using the interpreter
doesn't seem to be as ing
OK, I get it. Just stop whining endlessly about it, guys. I *do* use
the interpreter. I posted a question here. Sorry, I committed a sin.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Sathyaish wrote:
> I) What does the following expression evaluate to?
>
> a < b == c
>
> 1) (a < b) and (b == c)
> 2) (a < b) or (b == c)
then later
> 1) It is easier to learn through an interactive medium like a forum;
There is a convenient alternative to asking basic questions on c.l.py or
>And firing up a news client, posting a message, and /waiting/ for a
response isn't? In most cases, you could have read half the language
reference manual in the time it takes to get an online response.
No, it isn't because you continue reading the same stuff and you have
the stuff open in another
Sathyaish wrote:
> I did "guess" but I wasn't quite sure and so I asked. OK, I did not
> perform a search on the docs, but that was because:
>
> 1) It is easier to learn through an interactive medium like a forum;
and what exactly do you think the other people in the forum do? They go off
and r
John,
I did "guess" but I wasn't quite sure and so I asked. OK, I did not
perform a search on the docs, but that was because:
1) It is easier to learn through an interactive medium like a forum;
and
2) A search in the same document you are reading takes you "off" and
"adrift", and as such, is eq
On 20/03/2006 5:24 PM, Sathyaish wrote:
> I) What does the following expression evaluate to?
>
> a < b == c
>
> 1) (a < b) and (b == c)
> 2) (a < b) or (b == c)
>
Given the common idiom in mathematics (a <= b <= c) and what it means,
please contemplate which of "and" and "or" might be the more
"Sathyaish" wrote:
> I) What does the following expression evaluate to?
>
> a < b == c
>
> 1) (a < b) and (b == c)
> 2) (a < b) or (b == c)
http://docs.python.org/ref/comparisons.html
Formally, if a, b, c, ..., y, z are expressions and opa, opb, ...,
opy are comparison operators, the
I) What does the following expression evaluate to?
a < b == c
1) (a < b) and (b == c)
2) (a < b) or (b == c)
II) How many operands can be chained for comparison in a single
expression? For e.g, is the under-stated expression a valid comparison
chain?
a < b == c > d
--
http://mail.python.org/
14 matches
Mail list logo
