On Jul 18, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Yu-Xi Lim wrote:
> This is going to be quite off-topic.
But helpful nonetheless.
> I'm not entirely familiar with SOX regulations. Is it necessary to
> capture it at the gateway?
I'm no lawyer either, so I probably know as much about this as you
do
Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
> Assuming a one person per one machine per one chat protocol it might be
> possible to recreate the tcp streams (a lot of packet capturing devices
> already do that). So the gateway would have to have some kind of a
> dispatch that would recognize the initialization of a cha
Assuming a one person per one machine per one chat protocol it might be
possible to recreate the tcp streams (a lot of packet capturing devices
already do that). So the gateway would have to have some kind of a
dispatch that would recognize the initialization of a chat loggon and
start a capture pr
On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
> It depends on what IM protocol the company is using. If there is more
> than one, your job might end up being quite complicated. You indicated
> port 5190 in your post, does it mean that the company is using only
> AOL
> IM?
Yes, the
Ed,
It depends on what IM protocol the company is using. If there is more
than one, your job might end up being quite complicated. You indicated
port 5190 in your post, does it mean that the company is using only AOL
IM? In general it seems like you would have to:
1) Capture the traffic
2) Decode
Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But assuming that there is no such product, would it be
> possible to create something in Python, using the socket or a similar
> module? They have a number of servers that provide NAT for each group
> of machines; I was thinking that something on tho
I've been approached by a local business that has been advised that
they need to start capturing and archiving their instant messaging in
order to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley. The company is largely PC, but
has a significant number of Macs running OS X, too.
Googling around qu
