Maese Fernando wrote:
> I'm getting an odd error while trying to call the __init__ method of a
> super class:
>
> BaseField.__init__(self)
> TypeError: unbound method __init__() must be called with BaseField
> instance as first argument (got nothing instead)
>
>
> This is the code:
No, it isn'
Hi,
I'm getting an odd error while trying to call the __init__ method of a
super class:
BaseField.__init__(self)
TypeError: unbound method __init__() must be called with BaseField
instance as first argument (got nothing instead)
This is the code:
class BaseField(object):
def _addFieldsTo
On 8/1/07, Evan Klitzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I was reading this article: http://fuhm.net/super-harmful/ and didn't
> understand the comment about calling super(Foo, self).__init__() when
> Foo inherits only from object. Can someone on the list elaborate more
> on why one should
Hi list,
I was reading this article: http://fuhm.net/super-harmful/ and didn't
understand the comment about calling super(Foo, self).__init__() when
Foo inherits only from object. Can someone on the list elaborate more
on why one should do this?
--
Evan Klitzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
http://mai
Florian Lindner wrote:
> Hello,
> I try to call the superclass of the ConfigParser object:
>
> class CustomizedConfParser(ConfigParser.SafeConfigParser):
> def get(self, section, attribute):
> try:
> return super(CustomizedConfParser, self).get(section,
> attri
Hello,
I try to call the superclass of the ConfigParser object:
class CustomizedConfParser(ConfigParser.SafeConfigParser):
def get(self, section, attribute):
try:
return super(CustomizedConfParser, self).get(section, attribute)
# [...]
but that gives only
ret
