> ProcessPoolExecutor is built on the multiprocessing module, so I
> expect you should be able to use multiprocessing.Queue or
> multiprocessing.Pipe in place of threading.Queue.
Hi Ian,
Yeah I am using a Manager.Queue as the method polling the queue
is itself in a process.
I just wondered if the
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> I have a ProcessPoolExecutor for which I am attaching multiple callbacks.
> As this must be process based and not thread based, I don't have the
> luxury communication between threads. Without a queue, does something
> inherent exist in co
I have a ProcessPoolExecutor for which I am attaching multiple callbacks.
As this must be process based and not thread based, I don't have the
luxury communication between threads. Without a queue, does something
inherent exist in concurrent futures that allows me to accumulate some
data from the f
