On Apr 11, 3:49 pm, Silfheed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 10:33 am, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi again,
>
> > Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > > Silfheed wrote:
> > >> So first off I know that CDATA is generally hated and just shouldn't
> > >> be done, but I'm simply req
On Apr 11, 10:33 am, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Silfheed wrote:
> >> So first off I know that CDATA is generally hated and just shouldn't
> >> be done, but I'm simply required to parse it and spit it back out.
> >> Parsing is pretty easy with l
Hi again,
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Silfheed wrote:
>> So first off I know that CDATA is generally hated and just shouldn't
>> be done, but I'm simply required to parse it and spit it back out.
>> Parsing is pretty easy with lxml, but it's the spitting back out
>> that's giving me issues. The fact t
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> It's not as trivial as it sounds. Removing the CDATA sections in the parser is
> just for fun.
... *not* just for fun ...
obviously ...
Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Silfheed wrote:
> So first off I know that CDATA is generally hated and just shouldn't
> be done, but I'm simply required to parse it and spit it back out.
> Parsing is pretty easy with lxml, but it's the spitting back out
> that's giving me issues. The fact that lxml strips all the CDATA
> stuff
Heyas
So first off I know that CDATA is generally hated and just shouldn't
be done, but I'm simply required to parse it and spit it back out.
Parsing is pretty easy with lxml, but it's the spitting back out
that's giving me issues. The fact that lxml strips all the CDATA
stuff off isnt really a b
