On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:07:57 -0400, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On a point of information, Wireshark wokrs very effectively under
>Windows. The only thing you shouldn't expect to be able to do is tap
>into the loopback network, and that's down to the Windows driver structure.
Thanks
Björn Keil wrote:
[...]
>
> I hope that helped and I wasn't telling things you already new.
> As a sidenote: For the task you describe I'd rather use an actual
> sniffer - such as Wireshark (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireshark),
> than logs of a Proxy... Not sure wether Wireshark works under Wi
On 21 Apr 2007 14:47:55 -0700, Björn Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Well, I am brand new to Python, so it takes me a lot of guessing, but
>since it seems you're using urlib2:
Thanks. Indeed, it looks like urlib2 is the way to go when going
through a proxy.
For those interested, here's how to d
On 21 Apr., 23:28, Gilles Ganault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to download pages from a site, but it checks whether
> the requests are coming from a live user or a script; If the latter,
> the server returns a blank page.
>
> Using a proxy (Paros), I can see what information my script and
Hello
I'd like to download pages from a site, but it checks whether
the requests are coming from a live user or a script; If the latter,
the server returns a blank page.
Using a proxy (Paros), I can see what information my script and
FireFox send, and there are a lot of information that P
