Re: Building Python: static library "3.2m"

2011-05-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > Currently I'm puzzling over an inordinate number of symbol-not-found > errors, even though it does seem to be finding the header files. It's > weird. And I think I've just figured out why. PyString_* functions are no longer supported -

Re: Building Python: static library "3.2m"

2011-05-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > It's a new feature in Python 3.2 to allow multiple versions of shared C > object files that differ in configure options (i.e. ones that affect the > Python C ABI) to co-exist in one Python installation.  "m" means that > they were built with pyma

Re: Building Python: static library "3.2m"

2011-05-22 Thread Ned Deily
In article , Chris Angelico wrote: > Question: Why "3.2m"? What does that m mean? It seems to have come up > a couple of times in the build process. It's a new feature in Python 3.2 to allow multiple versions of shared C object files that differ in configure options (i.e. ones that affect the

Building Python: static library "3.2m"

2011-05-22 Thread Chris Angelico
Hi! Just a quickie, I hope, where someone will probably be able to answer off the top of his head. I downloaded the 3.2 sources with the intention of building that instead of using Ubuntu's default Python 2.6.6. Ran ./configure, make, sudo make install, and then fiddled with a few things like make