In article ,
Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>I've noticed recently that a lot of the "refernces" and
>"in-reply-to" headers in c.l.p are broken, resulting in the
>inability to move from a child to a parent in a tree.
One issue with the mail/news gateway is that (unless it's been fixed)
In-Reply-To: does
Grant Edwards writes:
> Or is it just individual news/mail clients that are broken?
This, I believe. Many clients mess up the References and In-Reply-To
fields, in the face of many years of complaint to the vendors.
Most free-software clients get it right, AFAICT.
--
\ “Contentment is a
I've noticed recently that a lot of the "refernces" and
"in-reply-to" headers in c.l.p are broken, resulting in the
inability to move from a child to a parent in a tree.
For example in a recent reply (subejct: os.fdopen() issue in
Python 3.1?), the references and in-reply-to headers both
contained
