looping schrieb:
> Maybe this improvement could be backported in Python 2.4 branch for the
> next release ?
As Fredrik explains, this is probably the side-effect of a from-scratch
rewrite of the relevant functions. Another (undesirable) side-effect is
that the resulting binary won't work on Window
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> looping wrote:
>
> >
> > Very nice, but somewhat strange...
> > Is Python 2.4.3 os.walk buggy ???
>
>
> Why are you asking if something's buggy when you've already figured out
> what's been improved?
>
You're right, buggy isn't the right word...
Anyway thanks for your detail
looping wrote:
> Results on Windows XP after some run to fill the disk cache (with
> ~59000 files and ~3500 folders):
> Python 2.4.3 : 45s
> Python 2.5 : 10s
>
> Very nice, but somewhat strange...
> Is Python 2.4.3 os.walk buggy ???
No. A few "os" function are now implemented in terms of Window
Hi,
I noticed a big speed improvement in some of my script that use os.walk
and I write a small script to check it:
import os
for path, dirs, files in os.walk('D:\\FILES\\'):
pass
Results on Windows XP after some run to fill the disk cache (with
~59000 files and ~3500 folders):
Python 2.4.3 :
