Re: Beazley 4E P.E.R, Page29: Unicode

2013-07-14 Thread vek . m1234
Hello Steven, a 'thank you' sounds insufficient and largely disproportionate to to the time and energy you spent in drafting a thoroughly comprehensive answer to my question. I've cross posted both answers to stackoverflow (with some minor formatting changes). I'll try to do something nice on yo

Re: Beazley 4E P.E.R, Page29: Unicode

2013-07-14 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 20:09:31 -0700, vek.m1234 wrote: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17632246/beazley-4e-p-e-r-page29- unicode > > "directly writing a raw UTF-8 encoded string such as 'Jalape\xc3\xb1o' > simply produces a nine-character string U+004A, U+0061, U+006C, U+0061, > U+0070, U+0065

Re: Beazley 4E P.E.R, Page29: Unicode

2013-07-14 Thread vek . m1234
thank you (both of you) I follow now :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Beazley 4E P.E.R, Page29: Unicode

2013-07-14 Thread Joshua Landau
On 14 July 2013 04:09, wrote: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17632246/beazley-4e-p-e-r-page29-unicode > > "directly writing a raw UTF-8 encoded string such as 'Jalape\xc3\xb1o' simply > produces a nine-character string U+004A, U+0061, U+006C, U+0061, U+0070, > U+0065, U+00C3, U+00B1, U+00

Re: Beazley 4E P.E.R, Page29: Unicode

2013-07-14 Thread Terry Reedy
On 7/13/2013 11:09 PM, vek.m1...@gmail.com wrote: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17632246/beazley-4e-p-e-r-page29-unicode Is this David Beazley? (You referred to 'DB' later.) "directly writing a raw UTF-8 encoded string such as 'Jalape\xc3\xb1o' simply produces a nine-character string U+

Beazley 4E P.E.R, Page29: Unicode

2013-07-13 Thread vek . m1234
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17632246/beazley-4e-p-e-r-page29-unicode "directly writing a raw UTF-8 encoded string such as 'Jalape\xc3\xb1o' simply produces a nine-character string U+004A, U+0061, U+006C, U+0061, U+0070, U+0065, U+00C3, U+00B1, U+006F, which is probably not what you intend