Duncan Booth wrote:
> John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Strictly speaking, it's Microsoft's fault.
>>
>> title="". So all that following stuff is from what
>>follows the next "-->" which terminates a comment.
>
>
> It is an attribute value, and unescaped angle brackets are valid
On Mar 29, 1:50 am, John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a construct with which BeautifulSoup has problems. It's
> from "http://support.microsoft.com/contactussupport/?ws=support";.
>
> This is the original:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/usability/enroll.mspx";
> id="L_75998"
>
"Justin Ezequiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 4:08 pm, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > title="
On Mar 29, 6:11 pm, "Justin Ezequiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> FWIW, seehttp://tinyurl.com/yjtzjz
>
hmm. not quite right.
http://tinyurl.com/ynv4ct
or
http://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/documentation.html#Customizing%20the%20Parser
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
On Mar 29, 4:08 pm, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > title="
John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Strictly speaking, it's Microsoft's fault.
>
> title="". So all that following stuff is from what
> follows the next "-->" which terminates a comment.
It is an attribute value, and unescaped angle brackets are valid in
attributes. It looks to me lik
Here's a construct with which BeautifulSoup has problems. It's
from "http://support.microsoft.com/contactussupport/?ws=support";.
This is the original:
http://www.microsoft.com/usability/enroll.mspx";
id="L_75998"
title="". So all that following stuff is from what
follows the next "-
