Re: Basic Packaging strategy question

2017-03-07 Thread Paul Moore
On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 01:45:10 UTC, bilm...@gmail.com wrote: > It still seems strange to me that such a well documented ecosystem does not > have an official way to package a complete app ( vs packages ). Well, it's a combination of history, the fact that the whole thing is platform depen

Re: Basic Packaging strategy question

2017-03-06 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:08:15 -0800, bilmar19 wrote: > I have a simple project that I want to package to put it on another > machine but everything I have read so far about packaging ends up > putting the whole install alongside with 'packages' - typically in > .../site-packages. > This seems a st

Re: Basic Packaging strategy question

2017-03-06 Thread bilmar19
Thanks, It still seems strange to me that such a well documented ecosystem does not have an official way to package a complete app ( vs packages ). Bill -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Basic Packaging strategy question

2017-03-04 Thread ddbug
On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 1:08:25 AM UTC+2, bilm...@gmail.com wrote: > I have a simple project that I want to package to put it on another machine > but everything I have read so far about packaging ends up putting the whole > install alongside with 'packages' - typically in .../site-packages.

Basic Packaging strategy question

2017-03-04 Thread bilmar19
I have a simple project that I want to package to put it on another machine but everything I have read so far about packaging ends up putting the whole install alongside with 'packages' - typically in .../site-packages. This seems a strange place to launch an app from! So, if I have an app wit