On Jan 18, 11:37 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-01-18, Jive Dadson wrote:
>
> > I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. Gnuplot.
> > Apparently one of its routines has a parameter named "with." That used
> > to be okay, and now it's not.
>
> I remember seeing depreicated
On 2010-01-18, Jive Dadson wrote:
> I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. Gnuplot.
> Apparently one of its routines has a parameter named "with." That used
> to be okay, and now it's not.
I remember seeing depreicated warnings about that _years_ ago,
and I would have swor
Jive Dadson wrote:
Matt Newville wrote:
On Jan 17, 7:25 pm, Jive Dadson wrote:
I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. >
Gnuplot. Apparently one of its routines has a parameter
named "with." That used to be okay, and now it's not.
This was fixed in version 1.8 of Gnuplo
Jive Dadson wrote:
> Matt Newville wrote:
>> On Jan 17, 7:25 pm, Jive Dadson wrote:
>>> I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. >
>>> Gnuplot. Apparently one of its routines has a parameter
>>> named "with." That used to be okay, and now it's not.
>>
>> This was fixed in versi
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Jive Dadson wrote:
> Matt Newville wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 17, 7:25 pm, Jive Dadson wrote:
>>>
>>> I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. > Gnuplot.
>>> Apparently one of its routines has a parameter
>>> named "with." That used to be okay, and no
Matt Newville wrote:
On Jan 17, 7:25 pm, Jive Dadson wrote:
I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. > Gnuplot.
Apparently one of its routines has a parameter
named "with." That used to be okay, and now it's not.
This was fixed in version 1.8 of Gnuplot.py
Once I get ev
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Jive Dadson wrote:
> I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. Gnuplot.
> Apparently one of its routines has a parameter named "with." That used to
> be okay, and now it's not.
>
> Once I get everything to work under 2.6, I am using it forever o
Matt Newville wrote:
On Jan 17, 7:25 pm, Jive Dadson wrote:
I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. > Gnuplot.
Apparently one of its routines has a parameter
named "with." That used to be okay, and now it's not.
This was fixed in version 1.8 of Gnuplot.py
Once I get ev
Matt Newville wrote:
Hey, good luck with that forever plan.
--Matt
Yeah, I know. I'm just glad I don't have to get new executables and
dll's from all my software vendors every Tuesday when the MS Window XP
updates come out.
2.6 FOREVER!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
On Jan 17, 7:25 pm, Jive Dadson wrote:
> I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. > Gnuplot.
> Apparently one of its routines has a parameter
> named "with." That used to be okay, and now it's not.
This was fixed in version 1.8 of Gnuplot.py
> Once I get everything to work u
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Jive Dadson wrote:
> I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. Gnuplot.
> Apparently one of its routines has a parameter named "with." That used to
> be okay, and now it's not.
>
> Once I get everything to work under 2.6, I am using it forever or
I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. Gnuplot.
Apparently one of its routines has a parameter named "with." That used
to be okay, and now it's not.
Once I get everything to work under 2.6, I am using it forever or until
new releases no longer break working code, whicheve
12 matches
Mail list logo
