http://bugs.python.org/issue9179
On Jul 5, 9:38 pm, MRAB wrote:
> andrew cooke wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 8:56 pm, MRAB wrote:
> >> andrew cooke wrote:
> >>> What am I missing this time? :o(
> >> Nothing. It's a bug. :-(
>
> > Sweet :o)
>
> > Thanks - do you want me to raise an issue or will you?
>
>
andrew cooke wrote:
On Jul 5, 8:56 pm, MRAB wrote:
andrew cooke wrote:
What am I missing this time? :o(
Nothing. It's a bug. :-(
Sweet :o)
Thanks - do you want me to raise an issue or will you?
You found it. You can have the pleasure.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
On Jul 5, 8:56 pm, MRAB wrote:
> andrew cooke wrote:
> > What am I missing this time? :o(
> Nothing. It's a bug. :-(
Sweet :o)
Thanks - do you want me to raise an issue or will you?
Cheers,
Andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
andrew cooke wrote:
As ever, I guess it's most likely I've misunderstood something, but in
Python 2.6 lookback seems to actually be lookahead. All the following
tests pass:
from re import compile
assert compile('(a)b(?<=(?(2)x|c))(c)').match('abc')
assert not compile('(
As ever, I guess it's most likely I've misunderstood something, but in
Python 2.6 lookback seems to actually be lookahead. All the following
tests pass:
from re import compile
assert compile('(a)b(?<=(?(2)x|c))(c)').match('abc')
assert not compile('(a)b(?<=(?(2)b|x))(c)'
