venk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool,
> i got it now... accessing thru attribute reference always
> returns a bound or unbound method... so, D.f is an unbound method
Right. Specifically, accessing through a (newstyle) class or instance
always calls the __get__ method of a descriptor [
Cool,
i got it now... accessing thru attribute reference always
returns a bound or unbound method... so, D.f is an unbound method
whereas i want the "function" of the unbound method... ok, this
example and the nice explanations definitively thought me about
function, bound method (for
venk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> given below is my interaction with the interpreter In one case, i
> have created the class method using the "famous idiom"... and in the
> other, i have tried to create it outside the class definition... why
> isn't the latter working ? (of course, the
On 3 Nov 2005 03:19:22 -0800, "venk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
> given below is my interaction with the interpreter In one case, i
>have created the class method using the "famous idiom"... and in the
>other, i have tried to create it outside the class definition... why
>isn't the latter
Hi,
given below is my interaction with the interpreter In one case, i
have created the class method using the "famous idiom"... and in the
other, i have tried to create it outside the class definition... why
isn't the latter working ? (of course, the presence of decorators is a
different issue
