Re: Advise on using logging.getLogger needed.

2011-10-07 Thread Vinay Sajip
On Oct 2, 11:12 pm, "Steven W. Orr" wrote: > I hope I don't sound like I'm ranting :-( You don't, but neither is it absolutely clear what you're trying to achieve. BTW the term "root logger" in the logging docs refers to a logger internal to the logging package, and not to a logger that you creat

Re: Advise on using logging.getLogger needed.

2011-10-03 Thread Gelonida N
On 10/03/2011 12:12 AM, Steven W. Orr wrote: > I hope I don't sound like I'm ranting :-( > > I have created a module (called xlogging) which sets up logging the way I want > it. I found out that if I set up my logger without a name, then it gets > applied to every logger that is referenced by ever

Re: Advise on using logging.getLogger needed.

2011-10-03 Thread Jean-Michel Pichavant
Steven W. Orr wrote: I hope I don't sound like I'm ranting :-( I have created a module (called xlogging) which sets up logging the way I want it. I found out that if I set up my logger without a name, then it gets applied to every logger that is referenced by every module that ever gets imported

Advise on using logging.getLogger needed.

2011-10-02 Thread Steven W. Orr
I hope I don't sound like I'm ranting :-( I have created a module (called xlogging) which sets up logging the way I want it. I found out that if I set up my logger without a name, then it gets applied to every logger that is referenced by every module that ever gets imported. The problem is that