Re: Adherence to PEP 8 for published code

2008-04-07 Thread Ben Finney
Aldo Cortesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is getting silly. Agreed. > Let's recap. You are upset Not at all. -- \ "We spend the first twelve months of our children's lives | `\ teaching them to walk and talk and the next twelve years | _o__)telling them to

Re: Adherence to PEP 8 for published code (was: ANN: pry unit testing framework)

2008-04-07 Thread Aldo Cortesi
Thus spake Ben Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > PEP 8 only has the force that people grant it. Nevertheless, it's a > style guide that's widely accepted in the Python community, and > adhering to it in one's code makes it easier to read for the majority, > because it reduces the needless inconsistenc

Adherence to PEP 8 for published code (was: ANN: pry unit testing framework)

2008-04-06 Thread Ben Finney
Aldo Cortesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thus spake Ben Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > I'm afraid that Pry is unashamedly incompatible with any other unit > > > testing method in existence, including but not limited to doctest, > > > unittest, nose and py.test. ;) I didn't write this. Ple