On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:16 PM, rusi wrote:
> On Saturday, December 7, 2013 8:11:45 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
>> > That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
>> > mailing list config. No??
>
>> If in doubt, blame someo
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 8:11:45 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
> > That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
> > mailing list config. No??
> If in doubt, blame someone else, eh?
> I'd first check what your browser's
On 07/12/2013 02:41, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
mailing list config. No??
If in doubt, blame someone else, eh?
I'd first check what your browser's actually sending. Firebug will
help ther
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
> That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
> mailing list config. No??
If in doubt, blame someone else, eh?
I'd first check what your browser's actually sending. Firebug will
help there. See if your form fill-out is encoded as
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 12:30:18 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:03:57 -0800, rusi wrote:
> > Evidently (and completely inadvertently) this exchange has just
> > illustrated one of the inadmissable assumptions:
> > "unicode as a medium is universal in the same wa
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> - character 33 was permitted to be either the exclamation
> mark ! or the logical OR symbol |
>
> - consequently character 124 (vertical bar) was always
> displayed as a broken bar ¦, which explains why even today
>
Steven D'Aprano pearwood.info> writes:
> Yes, it appears that MT-NewsWatcher is *deeply, deeply* confused about
> encodings and character sets. It doesn't just assume things are ASCII,
> but makes a half-hearted attempt to be charset-aware, but badly. I can
> only imagine that it was written b
On Friday 06 December 2013 14:30:06 Steven D'Aprano did opine:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:03:57 -0800, rusi wrote:
> > Evidently (and completely inadvertently) this exchange has just
> > illustrated one of the inadmissable assumptions:
> >
> > "unicode as a medium is universal in the same way that
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:03:57 -0800, rusi wrote:
> Evidently (and completely inadvertently) this exchange has just
> illustrated one of the inadmissable assumptions:
>
> "unicode as a medium is universal in the same way that ASCII used to be"
Ironically, your post was not Unicode.
Seriously. I a
