On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:40:09 -0700, jdh2358 wrote:
> I'll start by saying that I for one won't criticize you for rolling you
> own plotting package rather than join forces with an existing project.
> I've been accused of the same, on more than one occasion :-) But I'm also
> aware of the problem
Hi Jeremy,
I'm the matplotlib author -- I'm writing under a different email
address since my email server seems to be dying...
I'll start by saying that I for one won't criticize you for rolling you
own plotting package rather than join forces with an existing project.
I've been accused of the sa
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:55:17 -0700, hemanth wrote:
> Why not matplotlib? Of late, it has seemed to have picked up a lot of
> attention. I would prefer that the different plotting packages developers
> join hands and implement missing features into a single plotting package
> and make this a part o
Why not matplotlib? Of late, it has seemed to have picked up
a lot of attention. I would prefer that the different plotting
packages developers join hands and implement missing features
into a single plotting package and make this a part of Python
standard library. In contrast to the various web fr
Jeremy Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Veusz 0.5
> -
> Velvet Ember Under Sky Zenith
> -
> http://home.gna.org/veusz/
>
> Veusz is a scientific plotting package written in Python (currently
> 100% Python). It uses PyQt for display and user-interfaces, and
Veusz 0.5
-
Velvet Ember Under Sky Zenith
-
http://home.gna.org/veusz/
Veusz is Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Jeremy Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Licenced under the GPL (version 2 or greater)
Veusz is a scientific plotting package written in Python (currently
100% Pyt
