Tobiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the problem further, I am getting the idea that
> PGP, or GPG (Asymetric encryption) would be better, because
> then all of the software that has to *write* CC numbers, would
> not have to access the 'secret' key.
Yes.
> PGP sounds great, but it see
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Tobiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I browsed this subject and thought I might use the 'AES' cypher
>> scheme to do this. Would this be a good choice?
>
> There's more to it than that, but yes, AES is a good underlying
> algorithm.
Looking at the problem further, I am getti
Tobiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I browsed this subject and thought I might use the 'AES' cypher
> scheme to do this. Would this be a good choice?
There's more to it than that, but yes, AES is a good underlying
algorithm.
> So my real question is, how do I go about generating the best key.
>
I browsed this subject and thought I might use the
'AES' cypher scheme to do this. Would this be
a good choice?
I came across a "Python Cryptography Toolkit"
http://www.amk.ca/python/code/crypto
which has a nice AES implementation, but in
the example, a simple string is passed as the
key:
obj=
