Honestly, the best implementation strategy I can think of is to first
implement a Python interpreter for the actual mainframe environment.
Then invent an RPC layer that can semi-transparently bridge the two for
when you want to call a module that only exists in the Windows
environment (or call _fr
Let me rephrase my question in other way.
class myClass:
def __init__(self, var):
self.var = var
myObj = myClass(abc)
# I am calling instance with function name and arguments
myObj func1 arg1 arg2
Can i associate any function like __init__ with instance ? Means if I just use
in
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016, at 19:27, Loren Wilton wrote:
> So I don't want to WRITE a Python interpreter for the actual mainframe
> environment. I want to use an interpreter for an existing environment
> (Windows) where there are already a lot of existing libraries. But
> since a lot of the data to be an
Well I jump from TCL to Python. And found that it was very convenient to use
Procs there. So I was looking for that luxury in Python.
I am not trying to reinvent the wheel. I was just curious to know if there is
any possibility to create a caller function in my way (TCL) where I can call
pyth
"Loren Wilton" writes:
> strength of Python is that there are many existing 3rd party libraries
> that do lots of useful things. Since a lot of them are distributed as
> binaries, they would not work in this mainframe environment.
Python libraries are usually available as source, either in Python
Oops, apologies for replying to the wrong thread!
Loren
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 06/10/2016 18:06, mr.puneet.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I just started learning python. Is there any way to call functions in different
way ?
Rather calling obj.function(arg1, arg2) I would like to call like below
"obj function arg1 arg2"
As has been pointed out, it's difficult to tell whe
[Cue the decades-old story about the elaborate set of C macros that I
once saw somebody using so he could write a C program that looked like
some flavor of structured BASIC.]
I once wrote a set pf C defines so that I could compile Pascal with a C
compiler without having to change the Pascal sou
On 2016-10-06, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> The only way to do this will be to write your own pre-processor, which will
> parse your source code, and translate it from your language to valid
> Python. That's a lot of work for very little value -- I recommend you just
> learn the Python syntax rather t
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 04:06 am, mr.puneet.go...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just started learning python. Is there any way to call functions in
> different way ?
>
> Rather calling obj.function(arg1, arg2) I would like to call like below
>
> "obj function arg1 arg2"
No. This will be a syntax erro
mr.puneet.go...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just started learning python. Is there any way to call functions in
> different way ?
>
> Rather calling obj.function(arg1, arg2) I would like to call like below
>
> "obj function arg1 arg2"
How would the machine reading the above know that you didn'
Hi
I just started learning python. Is there any way to call functions in different
way ?
Rather calling obj.function(arg1, arg2) I would like to call like below
"obj function arg1 arg2"
this function is part of a class.
class myClass:
def function(arg1, arg2):
# do something
12 matches
Mail list logo
