Ivan Van Laningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course I wouldn't base decisions _only_ on whether or not [PYTHON]
> appears in the subject. But I ordinarily do base decisions on the whole
> subject line, and I think that's perfectly reasonable. There's nothing
> else to go on without opening
On 4/14/05, mark hellewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/14/05, Steven Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For what it's worth I filed a gmail issue over it a few days after I noticed
> > it. I guess more of you could do so indicating the severity of the issue to
> > the gmail developers. A
On 4/14/05, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Mill wrote:
>
> > > Maybe we should contact the gmail admins?
> >
> > I've already contacted the gmail admins. There was no response.
>
> have you tried reading the newsgroup via
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.pyt
Bill Mill wrote:
> > Maybe we should contact the gmail admins?
>
> I've already contacted the gmail admins. There was no response.
have you tried reading the newsgroup via
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.python
while being logged in to your gmail account?
--
http://mail.
On 4/14/05, Steven Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what it's worth I filed a gmail issue over it a few days after I noticed
> it. I guess more of you could do so indicating the severity of the issue to
> the gmail developers. And I thought I was the only one...!
I've now done the same. L
On 4/14/05, César Leonardo Blum Silveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah that is happening to me too! Almost all my python-list e-mails go
> to the Spam box.
> Maybe we should contact the gmail admins?
>
I've already contacted the gmail admins. There was no response.
Peace
Bill Mill
bill.mill
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-04-14 09:06:08 -0600:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >
> > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-04-14 08:22:48 -0600:
> > > The listowner could turn on the [PYTHON] headers.
> >
> > I hope they don't.
> >
>
> What's your reasoning?
It's 9 characters ("[PYTHON] ") of screen
Hi All--
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-04-14 08:22:48 -0600:
> > The listowner could turn on the [PYTHON] headers.
>
> I hope they don't.
>
What's your reasoning?
> > I'm not using spambayes yet, although I'm leaning toward it, but that
> > step alone could save me
On 4/14/05, mark hellewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/14/05, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please do not reply to spam. Replying to spam makes it much harder for
> > spam filters to catch all the spam or will produce very many false
> > positives. Atleast that's how gmail's
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-04-14 08:22:48 -0600:
> The listowner could turn on the [PYTHON] headers.
I hope they don't.
> I'm not using spambayes yet, although I'm leaning toward it, but that
> step alone could save me some work when trying to decide based on
> subject line alone whether or n
Hi All--
The listowner could turn on the [PYTHON] headers. I'm not using
spambayes yet, although I'm leaning toward it, but that step alone could
save me some work when trying to decide based on subject line alone
whether or not an email is spam. As it stands now, it's too easy to
decide incorre
Yeah that is happening to me too! Almost all my python-list e-mails go
to the Spam box.
Maybe we should contact the gmail admins?
On 4/14/05, mark hellewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/14/05, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes - it's been like that for the last month or so now and it
For what it's worth I filed a gmail issue over it a few days after I
noticed it. I guess more of you could do so indicating the severity of
the issue to the gmail developers. And I thought I was the only one...!
/SOn 4/14/05, mark hellewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/14/05, James <[EMAIL PROT
On 4/14/05, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes - it's been like that for the last month or so now and it's quite
> annoying, especially seeing as before it was working at near enough
> 100% accuracy.
And I don't suppose there's much we can do about it?
mark
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/l
Yes - it's been like that for the last month or so now and it's quite
annoying, especially seeing as before it was working at near enough
100% accuracy.
On 4/14/05, mark hellewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/14/05, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please do not reply to spam. R
On 4/14/05, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please do not reply to spam. Replying to spam makes it much harder for
> spam filters to catch all the spam or will produce very many false
> positives. Atleast that's how gmail's filter works. And if you must
> reply, please change the subje
Please do not reply to spam. Replying to spam makes it much harder for
spam filters to catch all the spam or will produce very many false
positives. Atleast that's how gmail's filter works. And if you must
reply, please change the subject line.
On 13 Apr 2005 17:50:06 -0500, "."@bag.python.org <".
17 matches
Mail list logo
