Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-27 Thread BBands
PyScripter does it for me. http://code.google.com/p/pyscripter/ jab -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-25 Thread Дамјан Георгиевски
>> I don't know what an IBQ is. > > +IBQ- seems to be the way your newsreader displays the dashes that > where in Ben's posting. I see "em dash" characters there: I see IBQ too ... also weird is that he has Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-7 -- дамјан ( http://softver.org.mk/damjan/ ) G

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-25 Thread Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:02:01 +0100, Дамјан Георгиевски wrote: >>> I don't know what an IBQ is. >> >> +IBQ- seems to be the way your newsreader displays the dashes that >> where in Ben's posting. I see "em dash" characters there: > > I see IBQ too ... also weird is that he has Content-Type: text

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-23 Thread Max Erickson
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote: > Years ago I have found this nice small program, TextCalc: > http://www.atomixbuttons.com/textcalc/ > > Despite being very limited and being not integrated with > everything else, it's so handy that for me in certain situations > it's the right tool to use when I h

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-23 Thread Eduardo Lenz
On Thursday 22 January 2009 08:13:49 Vic Kelson wrote: > How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried > lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I > am be very productive indeed using IDLE... > > --v > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-23 Thread Eduardo O. Padoan
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:01 PM, wrote: > Eduardo O. Padoan: >> You are almost *describing* reinteract: > > - Thank you for the link and the software, I have not tried it yet, > but from the screencast it looks quite nice. > - I am glad that there are people that don't think that Emacs is > (desp

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread bearophileHUGS
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch: > +IBQ- seems to be the way your newsreader displays the dashes that where > in Ben's posting.  I see "em dash" characters there: I see, thank you. I never finish to see all the weird things of the Web (through google groups). Bye, bearophile -- http://mail.python.org/ma

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:17:57 -0800, bearophileHUGS wrote: > Ben Finney: > >> Many of us solve this by using a single full-featured programmer's >> editor that allows invoking a program +IBQ- written in any of *dozens >> or hundreds* of different languages +IBQ- from within the editor. > > I don'

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread bearophileHUGS
Eduardo O. Padoan: > You are almost *describing* reinteract: - Thank you for the link and the software, I have not tried it yet, but from the screencast it looks quite nice. - I am glad that there are people that don't think that Emacs is (despite being good) the alpha and omega of editing. There'

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Terry Reedy
Steve Holden wrote: Doug Morse wrote: On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:13:49 -0800 (PST), Vic Kelson wrote: How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I am be very productive indeed using IDLE... Since I

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Eduardo O. Padoan
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:10 AM, wrote: > I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit > python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes. But > the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to modify > the past code to run it again, or you want

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Steve Holden
Doug Morse wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:13:49 -0800 (PST), Vic Kelson > wrote: >> >> How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried >> lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I >> am be very productive indeed using IDLE... >> >> --v > >

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Doug Morse
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:13:49 -0800 (PST), Vic Kelson wrote: > > > How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried > lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I > am be very productive indeed using IDLE... > > --v I find Stani's Python Edito

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Vic Kelson
How about IDLE? It's a nice tool for the Python programmer. I've tried lots of IDEs, but when it comes down to it, on small-to-medium jobs I am be very productive indeed using IDLE... --v -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Stef Mientki
Several guys are working on a MatLab like editor / IDE, based on wxPython, including myself ;-) see http://mientki.ruhosting.nl/data_www/pylab_works/pw_debug.html e.g. with F9 it runs either the selected code or if nothing selected the whole code or even more powerfull (depending on your needs)

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread bearophileHUGS
Ben Finney: > Adding an editor to Python solves this problem only for Python. I'm sure that once such "editor" (I use the word editor for lack of a better term) is created, it can also be quickly adapted with other dynamic languages, like Ruby, TCL, Lua, Io, Perl, Awk, ecc. Probably it can't be a

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers
bearophileh...@lycos.com a écrit : I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes. But the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to modify the past code to run it again, or you want to embed a b

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Ben Finney
bearophileh...@lycos.com writes: > I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit > python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes. > But the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to > modify the past code to run it again, or you want to embe

Re: A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread Ben Finney
bearophileh...@lycos.com writes: > I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit > python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes. > But the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to > modify the past code to run it again, or you want to embe

A different kind of interface

2009-01-22 Thread bearophileHUGS
I use the Python shell daily, plus of course normal editors to edit python scripts. They both are very useful for different purposes. But the default interactive shell isn't much handy if you want to modify the past code to run it again, or you want to embed a bit of text in the code, or if you wan