On 5/29/2016 4:10 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 14:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
Blasted directly to this, and several other python related lists.
The source address is NOT in the email headers, and I'm sure that is n
On Sunday 29 May 2016 14:23:27 Random832 wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 14:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
>
> I didn't actually see the original message. Maybe it was sent directly
> to you (and perhaps other users, but not me) with a f
On Sunday, May 29, 2016 at 11:55:04 AM UTC-7, Peter Pearson wrote:
>
> No, it reached me, too, through NNTP.
I also saw it, through the Google Groups gateway.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 29 May 2016 14:23:27 -0400, Random832 wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 14:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
>
> I didn't actually see the original message. Maybe it was sent directly
> to you (and perhaps other users, but not me) with
On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 14:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
I didn't actually see the original message. Maybe it was sent directly
to you (and perhaps other users, but not me) with a forged header
implying it came from the list?
--
https://m
Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
On 5/29/2016 6:39 AM, Python-list wrote:
Look what I've just found on the web, that really cool, yeah, more info here
[likely toxic url snipped]
My Best, Python-list
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
