On 2/18/2016 9:22 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Anyone know one for deleting all responses to a troll post?
Thunderbird has 'ignore thread' on its context menu.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2016-02-19, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 07:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
> a bunch of garbage.
>
> *sigh*
>
> Time to update my procmail filters...
>
> Anyone know one for deleting all responses to a troll post?
Well for this particular imbecile, just blocking posts without any
lower-ca
On 02/02/2016 07:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
a bunch of garbage.
*sigh*
Time to update my procmail filters...
Anyone know one for deleting all responses to a troll post?
--
~Ethan~
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> WxPython is not ported either, much to my chagrin.
If wxPython "Classic" had just been ported to Python 3, I'm sure it
would be all done by now. But it was decided to rebuild wxPython from
the ground up instead.
Last I've heard, people gener
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 16.02.16 um 03:02 schrieb Rick Johnson:
>>
>> On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-6, John Ladasky wrote:
>>>
>>> I like lazy evaluation.
>>
>>
>> Well, it is a "Pythonic feature" no doubt.
>
>
>
> ?? I'm confused. Does Py
Am 16.02.16 um 03:02 schrieb Rick Johnson:
On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-6, John Ladasky wrote:
I like lazy evaluation.
Well, it is a "Pythonic feature" no doubt.
?? I'm confused. Does Python have lazy evaluation? I thought that Python
does eager evaluation. At least this
On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 6:02:24 PM UTC-8, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-6, John Ladasky wrote:
>
> Reguarding a migration from Python2 to Pyhton3, John said:
> > I had to wait until my favorite packages were ported
> > (numpy, scipy, matplotlib, pand
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
>> But once that happened, I moved from Py2 to Py3 years ago
>> with scarcely a bump, bruise, or scratch.
>
> So you have no Python2.x code remaining in your repos? Are
> you telling us that you moved *EVERYTHING* to Python3? If
> so, i can't im
On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-6, John Ladasky wrote:
Reguarding a migration from Python2 to Pyhton3, John said:
> I had to wait until my favorite packages were ported
> (numpy, scipy, matplotlib, pandas).
WxPython is not ported either, much to my chagrin.
> But once that happen
On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 12:54:41 PM UTC-8, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 12:02:35 AM UTC-6, John Ladasky wrote:
>
> > Rick, you don't like Python?
>
> If i didn't like Python, then i would happily let it self-
> destruct, yes? The problem is, i *DO* like Pytho
On 8 February 2016 at 16:53, Random832 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016, at 10:46, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> > I still think we should just retroactively declare 3.5 to be python 5,
>> > and then keep going with python 6, 7, etc...
>>
>> http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html
>
> Java's
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016, at 10:46, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > I still think we should just retroactively declare 3.5 to be python 5,
> > and then keep going with python 6, 7, etc...
>
> http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html
Java's hardly the only, or even the first, project to drop a v
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Random832 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016, at 10:40, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> Besides, you're forgetting that the whole point of having so many
>> backwards incompatible changes in Python 3 in the first place was to
>> get them out of the way and not have to do them further
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016, at 10:40, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Besides, you're forgetting that the whole point of having so many
> backwards incompatible changes in Python 3 in the first place was to
> get them out of the way and not have to do them further into the
> future. Python 4.0 has never been planned t
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 12:02:35 AM UTC-6, John Ladasky wrote:
>
>> Rick, you don't like Python?
>
> If i didn't like Python, then i would happily let it self-
> destruct, yes? The problem is, i *DO* like Python. Python2
> was a great
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> Would writing a script to figure out whether there are more
> statisticians or programmers be a statistician's job or a
> programmer's?
>
Yes.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
>> Data (science) is after all the hot subject
>> A programmer moving into that field typically starts with python
>> A statistician typically starts R
>
> There aren't THAT many statisticians out there, compared to programme
Rustom Mody writes:
> Data (science) is after all the hot subject
> A programmer moving into that field typically starts with python
> A statistician typically starts R
There aren't THAT many statisticians out there, compared to programmers.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
Am 07.02.16 um 08:04 schrieb Paul Rubin:
Steven D'Aprano writes:
According to TIOBE, Python's popularity continues to grow:
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
I wonder how much of that growth is Python 3 and how much is Python 2.
I'm amazed there's still so much
On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 8:04:42 AM UTC+1, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
> > According to TIOBE, Python's popularity continues to grow:
> > http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
>
> I wonder how much of that growth is Python 3 and how much is Python
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> According to TIOBE, Python's popularity continues to grow:
> http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
I wonder how much of that growth is Python 3 and how much is Python 2.
I'm amazed there's still so much C being done. I meet good programmers
a
On Sunday 07 February 2016 14:02, INADA Naoki wrote:
> Python 3 is a disaster because of incompatibility with Python 2.
How is that a disaster? What is your criteria for deciding what is, and
isn't, a disaster?
According to TIOBE, Python's popularity continues to grow:
http://www.tiobe.com/ind
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:02 PM, INADA Naoki wrote:
> Python 3 is a disaster because of incompatibility with Python 2. Python 3
> itself is not so bad.
> We can help disaster recovery by stop using Python 2 as possible.
>
> Let's stop using legacy Python!
>
It's not even a disaster. It's fairly ea
Python 3 is a disaster because of incompatibility with Python 2. Python 3
itself is not so bad.
We can help disaster recovery by stop using Python 2 as possible.
Let's stop using legacy Python!
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 12:02:35 AM U
On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 12:02:35 AM UTC-6, John Ladasky wrote:
> Rick, you don't like Python?
If i didn't like Python, then i would happily let it self-
destruct, yes? The problem is, i *DO* like Python. Python2
was a great language, but python3 has been a disaster. Heck,
even the BDF
I wonder if anyone besides Mr. Ladasky read through the Great Wall of Email.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 03/02/16 04:26, Rick Johnson wrote:
[ ... ]
And many children came from the far and wide, and they
would pet his snake, and they would play with his snake
Didn't know Pedobear had a biographer.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 03.02.2016 04:26, Rick Johnson wrote:
[STORY-TIME] THE BDFL AND HIS PYTHON PETTING ZOO
A long, long time a ago, in a sleepy little Scandinavian
village, somewhere
Yeah, I know, I shouldn't answer this troll-bait.
Rick, you don't like Python? Fine, go program in a language that you do like.
There are many to choose from! Meanwhile, Python is satisfying many
programmers' needs.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[STORY-TIME] THE BDFL AND HIS PYTHON PETTING ZOO
A long, long time a ago, in a sleepy little Scandinavian
village, somewhere outside of Stockholm, a wee little boy
was born
30 matches
Mail list logo