Steven D'Aprano :
> What about those who are so frustrated with trying to get sites to
> work that they just Allow All On This Page?
I'm occasionally frustrated by that, but I simply won't read that page.
Nothing truly important is lost.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On 01/13/2016 05:47 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> What of the poor souls who, for whatever reason, can't use NoScript?
>
> What about those who are so frustrated with trying to get sites to work that
> they just Allow All On This Page? I've seen websites that rely on anything
> up to forty or fifty
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:27 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> I realize that I'm taking this thread off-topic, but yes it's
>> important that the form itself be downloaded over a secure connection.
>> If I can MitM the form response over an insecure
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:17 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> You're quite probably right that obfuscating the display is security
>> theatre; but it's the security theatre that people are expecting. If
>> you're about to enter your credit card details
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> You're quite probably right that obfuscating the display is security
>> theatre; but it's the security theatre that people are expecting. If
>> you're about to enter your credit card det
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> You're quite probably right that obfuscating the display is security
> theatre; but it's the security theatre that people are expecting. If
> you're about to enter your credit card details into a web form, does
> it really matter whether or