Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Python 0.9.1

2021-02-18 Thread Dan Stromberg
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:39 PM David Mertz wrote: > As Skip pointed out to me privately, there are some minor limitations with > this version. E.g.: > > % python > >>> import glob > >>> import sys > >>> print 'hello' > hello > >>> print 2+2 > 4 > >>> print 2*2 > Unhandled exception: run-time er

Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Python 0.9.1

2021-02-16 Thread Skip Montanaro
> Also mind > http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2009/03/27/python_0_9_1p1.html > for result comparison. Thanks, Paul. I had lost track of Andrew. Good to know he's still out there. I wonder why his tar file was never sucked up into the historical releases page. Whew! My stupid

Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Python 0.9.1

2021-02-16 Thread Skip Montanaro
> If someone knows how to get the original Usenet messages from what Google > published, let me know. Seems the original shar is there buried in a Javascript string toward the end of the file. I think I've got a handle on it, though it will take a Python script to massage back into correct format

Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Python 0.9.1

2021-02-16 Thread Skip Montanaro
> > Wow. Was white-space not significant in this release of Python? I see the >> lack of indentation in the first Python programs. >> > > Indentation most certainly was significant from day 0. I suspect what > happened is that these files got busted somehow by the extraction process > used by Skip

Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Python 0.9.1

2021-02-16 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 2:59 PM Senthil Kumaran wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:58 PM Skip Montanaro > wrote: > >> >> I then pushed the result to a Github repo: >> >> https://github.com/smontanaro/python-0.9.1 >> > > Wow. Was white-space not significant in this release of Python? I see the >