On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 23:41:15 +0200, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Peter Pearson :
>
>> If you've never looked at the set of reals (x,y) satisfying x**y ==
>> y**x, it's worth a visit.
>
> Thanks, it was. The graph's something like this:
[snip]
>
> Where can I read more on the topic?
Sorry, I don't know
Peter Pearson :
> If you've never looked at the set of reals (x,y) satisfying x**y ==
> y**x, it's worth a visit.
Thanks, it was. The graph's something like this:
| : *
| : *
| : *
| : *
6 + : * *
On 09 Jan 2015 11:07:51 +0200, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
[snip]
> Which reminds me of a question that once made me smile, even laugh,
> and still does: 2**3 is almost 3**2 but not quite - what gives?
If you've never looked at the set of reals (x,y) satisfying x**y ==
y**x, it's worth a visit.
--
