Paul Rubin wrote:
I love this old rant about XML:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/9a30c508201627ee
This is my favorite:
http://weblog.burningbird.net/archives/2002/10/08/the-parable-of-the-languages
"I’m considered the savior, the ultimate solution, the final word.
Odes are
Paul Rubin wrote:
Stephen Waterbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I should note that I have to deal with XML a lot, but always
kicking and screaming (though much less now because of Fredrik's
Elementtree package ;). Thanks, Fredrik and Peter, for the
references. ;)
I love this old rant about XML:
h
Stephen Waterbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I should note that I have to deal with XML a lot, but always
> kicking and screaming (though much less now because of Fredrik's
> Elementtree package ;). Thanks, Fredrik and Peter, for the
> references. ;)
I love this old rant about XML:
http://gr
Peter Hansen wrote:
If merely thinking about the purpose of XML doesn't make it
clear where Steve got that idea ...
I meant no disparagement of Steve, and it is quite clear
where he got that (correct!) idea ...
It's also clear that the XML user community sees
that as part of *their* purpose in appl
