On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:10:39 -0500, Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Monday 24 October 2005 09:04 pm, darren kirby wrote:
>> quoth the Fredrik Lundh:
>> > (using either on the output from glob.glob is just plain silly, of course)
>>
>> Silly? Sure. os.listdir() is more on point. Never
Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think Mr. Lundh's point was only that the output from glob.glob is already
> guaranteed to be strings, so using either '%s'%f or str(f) is superfluous.
Just for the record - this was why I asked what the point was in the
first place.
On Monday 24 October 2005 09:04 pm, darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Fredrik Lundh:
> > (using either on the output from glob.glob is just plain silly, of course)
>
> Silly? Sure. os.listdir() is more on point. Never said I was the smartest.
> However, I will defend my post by pointing out that at
On 25/10/2005, at 3:36 PM, Steven Bethard wrote:
> I wouldn't fret too much about a sharp remark from Fredrik Lundh.
> They're pretty much all that way. ;) [...] It takes a little
> training to get used to
> him, but if you can look past the nasty bite, he's really a valuable
> resource around h
darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Fredrik Lundh:
>
>>(using either on the output from glob.glob is just plain silly, of course)
>
[snip]
>
> It is things like this that make me wary of posting to this list, either to
> help another, or with my own q's. All I usually want is help with a specific
quoth the Fredrik Lundh:
> (using either on the output from glob.glob is just plain silly, of course)
Silly? Sure. os.listdir() is more on point. Never said I was the smartest.
However, I will defend my post by pointing out that at the time it was the
only one that actually included code that di
