Re: [Image-SIG] Some issue with easy_install and PIL/Imaging

2009-10-05 Thread Chris Withers
Fredrik Lundh wrote: The problem is that too many people arguing for eggs do this by sending nastygrams, which doesn't really provide much motivation for doing anything about it (I don't do asshole-driven development). Indeed, I couldn't agree more, and I'm sorry you've been subjected to this.

Re: [Image-SIG] Some issue with easy_install and PIL/Imaging

2009-10-05 Thread Fredrik Lundh
The problem is that too many people arguing for eggs do this by sending nastygrams, which doesn't really provide much motivation for doing anything about it (I don't do asshole-driven development). The public review PIL got a couple a minutes ago matches some of the private mail I've gotten: n

Re: [Image-SIG] Some issue with easy_install and PIL/Imaging

2009-09-30 Thread Chris Withers
Fredrik Lundh wrote: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Chris Withers wrote: Klein Stéphane wrote: Resume : 1. first question : why PIL package in "pypi" don't work ? Because Fred Lundh have his package distributions unfortunate names that setuptools doesn't like... It used to support this, b

Re: [Image-SIG] Some issue with easy_install and PIL/Imaging

2009-09-28 Thread Fredrik Lundh
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Chris Withers wrote: > Klein Stéphane wrote: >> >> Resume : >> 1. first question : why PIL package in "pypi" don't work ? > > Because Fred Lundh have his package distributions unfortunate names that > setuptools doesn't like... It used to support this, but no long