Re: *Python* Power Tools

2005-06-22 Thread Ville Vainio
> "John" == John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> For windows users, apart from cygwin, there are a couple of John> sources of binaries for *x command-line utilities (unxutils, John> gnuwin32). unxutils is my personal favourite - cygwin is way too much an "environment", an

Re: *Python* Power Tools

2005-06-22 Thread Daniel Dittmar
Micah wrote: > Anyone know if there is any organized effort underway to implement the > Python equivalent of "Perl Power Tools" ? > > If not, would starting this be a waste of effort since: > > - it's already being done in Perl? > - cygwin thrives? > - UNIX is already pervas

Re: *Python* Power Tools

2005-06-21 Thread Terry Hancock
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 06:53 pm, John Machin wrote: > Micah wrote: > > Anyone know if there is any organized effort underway to implement the > > Python equivalent of "Perl Power Tools" ? > > > > If not, would starting this be a waste of effort since: > > +1 WOFTAM-of-the-y

Re: *Python* Power Tools

2005-06-21 Thread John Machin
Micah wrote: > Anyone know if there is any organized effort underway to implement the > Python equivalent of "Perl Power Tools" ? > > If not, would starting this be a waste of effort since: +1 WOFTAM-of-the-year > > - it's already being done in Perl? > - cygwin thrives? F

*Python* Power Tools

2005-06-21 Thread Micah
Anyone know if there is any organized effort underway to implement the Python equivalent of "Perl Power Tools" ? If not, would starting this be a waste of effort since: - it's already being done in Perl? - cygwin thrives? - UNIX is already pervasive :-) ? Or would people re