Lie Ryan writes:
> There are lots of reason why bare-except is bad, one being is that it
> makes it way too easy to ignore errors that you don't actually want to
> silence; and given that bare-excepts would prevent Ctrl+C (Interrupt)
> from working. Sorry, but IMHO we shouldn't make syntax sugar
o inflect it as a verb, not a noun -- you are telling the
> block to be silent). Finally, since this is the purest form of
> syntactic sugar, I cannot fathom any parsing, interpreting or other
> complications that would arise.
Given that python HATE bare-except (and `pass`-block bare excep
On 2006-05-08 02:51:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The phrase "only one obvious way..." is nearly the most absurd
> marketing bullshit I have ever heard; topped only by "it fits your
> brain". Why are so many clearly intelligent and apparently
> self-respect
>If I ever _DO_ find a language that *DOES* mercilessly refactor in pursuit
> of the ideal "only one obvious way", I may well jump ship, since my faith in
> Python's adherence to this principle which I cherish so intensely has
> been so badly broken ...
The phrase &
