On Apr 21, 1:14 am, "Hank @ITGroup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian Heimes wrote:
> > Gabriel Genellina schrieb:
>
> >> Apart from what everyone has already said, consider that FreqDist may
> >> import other modules, store global state, create other objects... whatever.
> >> Pure python cod
On Apr 21, 4:09 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm not sure if this will help the OP at all - going into a world of dangling
> pointers, keeping track of ownership, releasing memory by hand... One of the
> good things of Python is automatic memory management. Ensuring that
Hank @ITGroup wrote:
> In order to deal with 400 thousands texts consisting of 80 million
> words, and huge sets of corpora , I have to be care about the memory
> things. I need to track every word's behavior, so there needs to be as
> many word-objects as words.
> I am really suffering from th
En Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:19:43 -0300, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Apr 20, 9:09 pm, "Hank @ITGroup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Could you please give us some clear clues to obviously call python to
>> free memory. We want to control its gc operation handily as we were
>> using
En Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:23:32 -0300, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
>> Can you give an example, please?
>
> http://trac.edgewall.org/ contains at least one example of a reference
> leak. It's holding up the release of 0.11 for a while. *scnr*
>
> The prob
Hank @ITGroup wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
>> You are suffering from a pathological condition yourself: the desire
>> to optimize performance in an area where you do not have any problems.
>> I would suggest you just enjoy using Python and then start to ask
>> these questions again when you have
> http://trac.edgewall.org/ contains at least one example of a reference
> leak. It's holding up the release of 0.11 for a while. *scnr*
All my investigations on possible memory leaks in Trac have only
confirmed that Python does _not_, I repeat, it does *NOT* leak any
memory in Trac.
Instead, wha
Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
> Can you give an example, please?
http://trac.edgewall.org/ contains at least one example of a reference
leak. It's holding up the release of 0.11 for a while. *scnr*
The problem is also covered by the docs at
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/sys.html#sys.exc_info
Chr
On Apr 20, 9:09 pm, "Hank @ITGroup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you please give us some clear clues to obviously call python to
> free memory. We want to control its gc operation handily as we were
> using J**A.
If you want to get rid of a Python object, the only way to do that is
to get r
Hank @ITGroup schrieb:
> In order to deal with 400 thousands texts consisting of 80 million
> words, and huge sets of corpora , I have to be care about the memory
> things. I need to track every word's behavior, so there needs to be as
> many word-objects as words.
> I am really suffering from the
Steve Holden wrote:
>
> You are suffering from a pathological condition yourself: the desire
> to optimize performance in an area where you do not have any problems.
> I would suggest you just enjoy using Python and then start to ask
> these questions again when you have a real issue that's stop
> In order to deal with 400 thousands texts consisting of 80 million
> words, and huge sets of corpora , I have to be care about the memory
> things. I need to track every word's behavior, so there needs to be as
> many word-objects as words.
> I am really suffering from the memory problem, even 4G
En Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:02:37 -0300, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Gabriel Genellina writes:
>> En Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:43:17 -0300, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> escribió:
>>> Gabriel Genellina schrieb:
>>>
Apart from what everyone has already said, consider that
>>
> Pure Python code can cause memory leaks. No, that's not a bug in the
> interpreter but the fault of the developer. For example code that messes
> around with stack frames and exception object can cause nasty reference
> leaks.
Can you give an example, please?
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.pyt
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Gabriel Genellina schrieb:
>
>> Apart from what everyone has already said, consider that FreqDist may import
>> other modules, store global state, create other objects... whatever.
>> Pure python code should not have any memory leaks (if there are, it's a bug
>> in th
Hallöchen!
Gabriel Genellina writes:
> En Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:43:17 -0300, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
>
>> Gabriel Genellina schrieb:
>>
>>> Apart from what everyone has already said, consider that
>>> FreqDist may import other modules, store global state, create
>>> other o
En Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:43:17 -0300, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Gabriel Genellina schrieb:
>> Apart from what everyone has already said, consider that FreqDist may import
>> other modules, store global state, create other objects... whatever.
>> Pure python code should not h
Gabriel Genellina schrieb:
> Apart from what everyone has already said, consider that FreqDist may import
> other modules, store global state, create other objects... whatever.
> Pure python code should not have any memory leaks (if there are, it's a bug
> in the Python interpreter). Not-carefull
En Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:46:37 -0300, Hank @ITGroup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> ``starting python``# == Windows Task Manager:
> Python.exe *4,076 *K memory-usage ==
> >>> st1='abcdefg'*99 # == 10,952 K ==
> >>> del st1 # == *
Hank @ITGroup wrote:
> Apology for the previous offensive title~~
> :)
> Thanks, Rintsch, Arnaud and Daniel, for replying so soon.
>
> I redid the experiment. What following is the record -
>
> ``starting python``# == Windows Task Manager:
> Python.exe *4,076 *K memory-u
On Apr 20, 2:46 pm, "Hank @ITGroup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is my question, after ``del``, sometimes the memory space returns
> back as nothing happened, sometimes not... ...
> What exactly was happening???
Python has a garbage collector. Objects that cannot be reached from
any scope is
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:46:37 +1000, Hank @ITGroup wrote:
> Apology for the previous offensive title~~
> :)
> Thanks, Rintsch, Arnaud and Daniel, for replying so soon.
>
> I redid the experiment. What following is the record -
>
> ``starting python``# == Windows Task Manag
Apology for the previous offensive title~~
:)
Thanks, Rintsch, Arnaud and Daniel, for replying so soon.
I redid the experiment. What following is the record -
``starting python``# == Windows Task Manager:
Python.exe *4,076 *K memory-usage ==
>>> st1='abcdefg'*99
23 matches
Mail list logo
