Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-02-02 Thread king kikapu
Thank you all! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-02-01 Thread Alejandro Dubrovsky
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > king kikapu a écrit : >> Thanks for the replies. >> >> I think i do not need something like ORM, but just a db-module that i >> can "work" the database with it. > > FWIW, SQLAlchemy is not an ORM, but an higher-level API for SQL > integration. The ORM part is an opti

Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-02-01 Thread Peter Decker
On 1 Feb 2007 02:13:01 -0800, king kikapu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But one of the reasons that i started learning Python, is to NOT to be > tied-up again with ANY company or specific product again (i had enough > MS addiction over these years...). So, based on this direction, i am > using pyo

Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-02-01 Thread king kikapu
Ok, i see.. Thanks a lot all of you for the help. I know from my Win/.Net/Sql Server expertise that odbc put a layer in the mix. That's why, for example, in .Net we have a native SqlClient data provider that talks to Sql Server directly. But one of the reasons that i started learning Python, is t

Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-01-31 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
king kikapu wrote: > Thanks for the replies. > > I think i do not need something like ORM, but just a db-module that i > can "work" the database with it. > I just want to know if pyodbc is the "correct" solution to do so or if > it is another db-module that is more > usefull for this job. I thin

Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-01-31 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers
king kikapu a écrit : > Thanks for the replies. > > I think i do not need something like ORM, but just a db-module that i > can "work" the database with it. FWIW, SQLAlchemy is not an ORM, but an higher-level API for SQL integration. The ORM part is an optional feature built on top of this API.

Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-01-31 Thread king kikapu
Thanks for the replies. I think i do not need something like ORM, but just a db-module that i can "work" the database with it. I just want to know if pyodbc is the "correct" solution to do so or if it is another db-module that is more usefull for this job. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi

Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-01-31 Thread Daniel Nogradi
> Maybe you should take a look at sqlalchemy > > > Hi to all, > > > > i have started a month ago to seriously studying Python. I am now > > looking at the databases stuff > > and i want the opinion of more experienced Python programmers (than > > me) at the following : > > > > I see that there are

Re: "Correct" db adapter

2007-01-31 Thread Laurent Rahuel
Maybe you should take a look at sqlalchemy king kikapu wrote: > Hi to all, > > i have started a month ago to seriously studying Python. I am now > looking at the databases stuff > and i want the opinion of more experienced Python programmers (than > me) at the following : > > I see that there a

"Correct" db adapter

2007-01-31 Thread king kikapu
Hi to all, i have started a month ago to seriously studying Python. I am now looking at the databases stuff and i want the opinion of more experienced Python programmers (than me) at the following : I see that there are a lot of databases adapters on the net, some following the DB-API 2.0 and som