On 12/21/2013 11:59 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On 21 Dec 2013 11:31:22 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
I don't know. What is it? I'm sure your code is the most fabulous,
awesome and brilliant thing since Grace Hopper came up with FORmula
TRANslation back in the 1950s,
As I recall, Grace Hopper was i
On 21/12/2013 11:31, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:26:10 -0600, Brian Bruggeman wrote:
Is this something that would be pep-able?
I don't know. What is it? I'm sure your code is the most fabulous,
awesome and brilliant thing since Grace Hopper came up with FORmula
TRANslation b
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> If I were to implement something like this I'd probably use the old trick
> with nested functions:
>
> def getset(f):
> funcs = f()
> return property(funcs.get("get"), funcs.get("set"))
>
> class A(object):
> @gets
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:26:10 -0600, Brian Bruggeman wrote:
> Is this something that would be pep-able?
I don't know. What is it? I'm sure your code is the most fabulous,
awesome and brilliant thing since Grace Hopper came up with FORmula
TRANslation back in the 1950s, but my browser has over ei
Brian Bruggeman wrote:
> Is this something that would be pep-able?
>
> https://gist.github.com/brianbruggeman/8061774
There's no need to put such a small piece of code into an external
repository.
> class someAwesomeClass(object):
> """ an example """
>
> @property
> def some_
Is this something that would be pep-able?
https://gist.github.com/brianbruggeman/8061774
Thanks in advance.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
